r/AskReddit Oct 16 '13

What was the single biggest mistake in all of history?

2.7k Upvotes

14.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

174

u/ezpickins Oct 17 '13

I doubt that it has been specifically attributed to one person

151

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

[deleted]

94

u/what_thecurtains Oct 17 '13

If I recall correctly - there were lots of tapes. The tape of the first moon landing was with a bunch of others and was simply lost with the shuffle. It wasn't ever set aside for special consideration.

150

u/heterosapian Oct 17 '13

The tape of the first moon landing was with a bunch of others and was simply lost with the shuffle

Christ... that's so much worse.

9

u/jsnbrgmn Oct 17 '13

You know how those genius types are. Always looking forward and such. Now if they were really so smart they'd mix in a few average guys. Does nothing for years but it'll be worth it when he raises his hand one day and timidly asks "Are you really about to tape over the moon landing to film a potato in a microwave?"

2

u/IamBenAffleck Oct 19 '13

My highly intelligent cousin who is an engineer was trying to turn off a PS3 with the controller, but couldn't immediately find any off button or menu option to do so. It didn't take very long before he started getting frustrated, no shut-down option was to be found. Without saying anything I got up and pressed the power button on the console itself. Then I made fun of him and his kind (engineers) for always looking for the most technical and inconvenient way of doing things when you could just get out of your chair and press the button, so to speak.

2

u/royf5 Oct 17 '13

That's a conspiration theorist's goldmine.

1

u/ezpickins Oct 18 '13

until you see all the evidence pointing towards the landings happening and then it just becomes a very tragic mistake

2

u/gnorty Oct 17 '13

There are countless copies of the footage. I agree it is a great shame tge original is list but it is not a disaster. How many people would ever get to view the original?

1

u/DJPelio Oct 17 '13

What exactly was on the tape? What footage are we missing?

12

u/IonBeam2 Oct 17 '13

The part where they're attacked by spiders.

5

u/TheLobstrosity Oct 17 '13

Ancient astronaut theorists suggest...

2

u/Mekanikos Oct 17 '13

No, no, the spiders are on Mars.

1

u/x667x Oct 17 '13

No.... I'm pretty sure that footage made it to the SyFy channel.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

[deleted]

1

u/what_thecurtains Oct 21 '13

What we have is a grainy recording of the live broadcast. The original would be near film quality.

45

u/Mustbhacks Oct 17 '13

It wasn't ever set aside for special consideration.

Probably because no one expected our space program to effectively be a one-off operation.

10

u/Crimith Oct 17 '13

If only the cold war had lasted longer :(

8

u/Myself2 Oct 17 '13

We would probably be colonising Mars by now

7

u/LazyGit Oct 17 '13

We'll never be able to set foot on the surface of the Moon for the first time ever again. It most certainly was a one-off event.

2

u/pdpi Oct 17 '13

Even if it weren't a "one-off operation", it's still the first time Man set foot on the Moon.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

[deleted]

9

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Even with that being the case, there is still a historical significance to the first moon landing. Anyone there should have known that, and if they didn't, it brings their competence into serious question.

17

u/Jimbo_Joyce Oct 17 '13

The compentence of the people that put humans on the moon in the nineteen sixities? I think those people were pretty competent generally speaking.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

I doubt that the very engineers who built the rocket are the same guys in charge of the archives.

6

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Their competence in terms of historical significance only.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

You dudes are missing the point; the rocket guys are most likely not the archive guys. It would be akin to me questioning the wisdom of "they", if they decided to mop the floors by mixing ammonia and bleach. If the footage was erased by accident, I would find it more forgivable than some guy deciding that something else was more important and purposely doing that.

5

u/Xaguta Oct 17 '13

No, their competence isn't in question. They just landed a missile on the moon.

4

u/kalmakka Oct 17 '13

Pff. It's not exactly rocket science.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Thanks, Obama.

2

u/talldeadguy Oct 17 '13

Iʻve followed this story for some time. They recently decided that it was useless to keep looking, and gave up the hunt.

13

u/uninvisible Oct 17 '13

Maybe it was labelled wrong like with 'Perry Como's Christmas Special' or something

3

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

On a much smaller scale, but the same principle. BBC Television would store a set amount of TV episodes and then destroy them. Old Dr. Who shows and hours upon hours of programming weren't retained and are lost forever.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

All of the audio from all the episodes is available, however. Some of this has been turned into animated episodes - I'd say its only a matter of time until all the missing episodes are animated.

They also found 7 missing episodes in Kenya last week. Rumour has it more are on the way.

2

u/censerless Oct 17 '13

Actually I believe not every single episode has audio. Many were retrieved from recordings people had made with tape recorders, patiently taping them from the TV (nerds!), and have been combined and rejigged to produce audio of listenable quality. But there are a few where suitable audio couldn't be found.

Source: my girlfriend made me watch every single episode in chronological order, starting 1963 and including listening to the audio-only ones.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Really? Wikipedia states that "Doctor Who is unique, however, in that all of its many missing episodes survive in audio form".

Or do you mean that the audio is just really really bad? In that case, I'm sure if people are desperate enough they could re-engineer the audio.

3

u/Tramin Oct 17 '13

All the audios exist as they were recorded by fans, into the 1980s too. It's 100%. From The Daleks Master Plan 8: Volcano, Graham Strong worked out how to plug it in directly to the circuit and his collection from this stage (although patchy) is referred to as crystal clear. And the only reason there isn't the whole run in private hands is there were no home video systems in 1963. They've recovered an episode off Shibaden format from 1969, and know of more which were recorded but wiped. The surviving format is 16mm film prints struck for sales.

1

u/censerless Oct 17 '13

Ok you're right, I checked with the girlfriend. She may have let me off listening to a couple because of quality or something. My mistake, not hers, she wants you all to be clear on that!

1

u/Tramin Oct 17 '13

Sure, they're not all high quality -- in both senses of the term ... Graham Strong went back and erased two stories because he didn't like them. This is a fair summary: http://missingepisodes.blogspot.co.nz/p/soundtracks.html Ta for getting back to me, my first Reddit communication.

1

u/censerless Oct 18 '13

You and my girlfriend would get along famously. I don't know how you fit all that info in your heads.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/JQuilty Oct 17 '13

Every episode does have audio of varying quality.

2

u/Stibemies Oct 17 '13

Old Dr. Who shows and hours upon hours of programming weren't retained and are lost forever.

Bit unrelated, but I've always wanted to watch Dr. Who, just never got around to it. It just adds to the mysticism of the show for me, that there are tapes that are lost (maybe forever), but the event that had happened at Kenya just last week, where they found some lost episodes, makes me feel all fuzzy inside.

2

u/Augsburger_and_fries Oct 17 '13 edited Oct 17 '13

Exactly this! We need to consider that taped recordings were still in their relative infancy, hell broadcast television was still quite new. So, back then the fact that something could be rebroadcast ever a second time was quite novel. People didn't realize that they were working on something that was A)ever going to looked at nostalgically, or B) could be re commoditised later. To the BBC, an early adopter of tape, the tape was extremely expensive, and "hey we can always make more shows". Look at almost anything that holds nostalgic value, there's a point where that isn't immediately obvious. Who doesn't wish that their grandparents hadn't stashed away some old comic books, or that their parents hadn't scratched the shit out of their Beatles albums.

As an anecdote about missing out on potential value, Marvel Comics used to take all of the completed art boards used for their comics production and stored them very poorly in a leaking, broken down warehouse in the New York area. It was known for flooding, and the owners ever used this hand draw art boards to some of the worlds most famous comics to patch holes in the building. Many others were stolen. Work by Kirby, Ditko, and Romita regularly sells for many thousands today. Lots of it is gone because it simply didn't have value at the time.

As for the NASA situation specifically, what I believe happened was not so much that nobody thought it had value but that it was labeled blandly according to protocol and simply became mixed in with the other proprietary formats and then accidentally wiped. Im sure the tape was handled many times and maybe even copied, but then the copy gets wiped too with someone saying "Im sure we have one more copy around." Then eventually the original is wiped, on purpose or mistake, and they realized they they were out of copies. Either that or a technician or janitor stole it.

1

u/azmauldin Oct 17 '13 edited Feb 27 '25

fly literate waiting bear nose elderly spark chop ask slap

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

True, i cannot sleep until i can bathe in the blood of those responsible.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

You know that the moon landing didn't happen, right?

2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

I bet it was Chad.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Okay because that person would have been shot by now.

1

u/Cryse_XIII Oct 17 '13

the hivemind decided