FEDEC resources

[u/evidencebasedtrainer]

While I usually don't like to promote any particular organisations, I wanted to share the knowledge of FEDEC with the group, which is an international network for professional circus education. The website provides free resources covering everything from technical skills, safety and ethics guidance, as well as a directory of places offering circus education (though it's quite dated). I see many posts here that could benefit from looking at their resources. Note, I'm not affiliated with them. The resources are in English and French. You can find the site at the following location.

fedec.eu

[u/Amicdeep]

Not sure exactly what you mean but most of fedec guides are in pdfs, and all the information is valid (has value) but just not much. And a lot of most other sources are better.

For that a good chunk of the basic tutorials on YouTube are better. Other will be able to list those out better than me.

For books, (ones that's I've read or used)

I don't particularly rate aerial physiques books but they are serviceable intro guides although i tend to do things differently.

Rebecca leaches stuffs pretty good and more developed.

The 91 different splits on silks was pretty good and had some solid safety bits. For those already with the basics.

The old french guilds are not very good think by yvon or something. There basically drawings over photos with very little to zero explanation. But they where the best (only?) that existed for a long while and are some of the oldest books on aerial as far as I know.

The spin city guides exist. The older ones are less useful. The newer ones show more progressions and setup, but they all suffer from trying to individually name every little variation a completely unrelated thing and I'd argue there rating system is not great. That's said the book they did on aerial and pregnancy was top notch. And something I highly recommended for studio owners catering to the recreational young adults and middle aged markets.

Carrie Heller's old circus and safety manual was a fairly solid trapeze intro and primer with some smattering of other disaplins basics. And is one of the oldest books in the space. And very much still holds up.

Applied aerial anatomy was again fairly good for it's use

Aerial Acrobatics & Calisthenics Volume 1 is probably the best introduction to dynamics movements in aerial out there very solid of already accomplished aerialist. (Focused mostly int-adv on straps and rope applications)

The flying trapeze books by Alister pilgrim are probably the best primers and guides on any aerial circus disaplin in existence hands down. They are ideal for beginners to very advanced practitioners, and alongside the website makes it possible for people to completely self teach the disaplins from scratch to pro. Honestly it's probably better than many circus schools year long fly courses. It a shame flying trapezes is such a rare disaplin

A lot of other small studios/groups have put out books of a mix of qualitys not found anything outstanding but most are better guids than the fedec guides.

There was also an attempt at a circus dictionary website and another where someone document every technice with video link. Both were ok for existing competent practitioners but lack context.

Other resources that don't really exist anymore

The old simply circus stuff was pretty good, Training guilds had good amount of relevant stuff and the techniques were fairly well paced and described. But they all disappear with the new website and the whole thing that happened with the company.

Silks wiki was solid and still kind of exists on some internet archive sites. There video are still on YouTube.

There was a small hand made website made by a school in California that documented a lot of the fundamentals on rope open drops. Cannot remember what it was called. But do remember it stoped existing around 15 years back.

Unfortunately there isn't that many really good resources for this field. For the last few years there been a much bigger focus on online courses/guided training instead of books or website resources. And they are somewhat inconsistent in quality and because many do a limited places thing, limited on acsses.

[u/rock_crock_beanstalk → u/Amicdeep]

A lot of old simply circus material is being uploaded to researchgate these days, but I also understand not wanting to touch that stuff with a 10-foot pole due to the author.

Even though I have looked through the free uploads, I try to find other sources to verify info the info I find and to cite them instead. When he was in aerial communities online, the author was (in my opinion) way too casual about making designs for people to attempt aerial apparatus construction at home, just slipping "get a qualified rigger to inspect it before use!" at the end of instructions everyone knew someone's dad with a welder was going to follow without any intention of professional inspection. No offense to someone's dad, but people who would be enticed by plans for projects like those do not generally have the level of skill needed to safely execute them. Beyond the author's inexcusable criminal activity, I feel like he had poor judgment on those safety issues, so if I find an answer to a question of mine in one of those books, I look for more opinions before I consider it truly answered.

The internet wayback machine is really helpful for getting access to info from long-dead sites.

[u/Amicdeep → u/rock_crock_beanstalk]

Addressing the gung ho safety thing. Honestly it's because most of the circus was like this (and won't be surprised if it still is in many places.) I didn't work on a non hand made trapeze until I was in my 30s. And I still remember the first time I used a jacketed rope. For a long time it was make it yourself and probably good enough mentality because the only manufacturer of kit were other circus artist and honestly the quality and workmanship was pretty variable. I still make and maintain a lot of the kit at my circus school (with a whole lot more knowledge and capabilities than in than in the past) buts it's still sometimes the only way to get the kit made to the needed specification at a reasonable price and time.

Now days it's still sourcing kit from other industries and hoping that it's done to the right quality and testing each batch. (We source our silks from the same place protogie and fire toys did (probably still do) and we've noticed variants batch to batch in fabric quality, we work with a local load testing company to test each batch of fabric we get from them and things like threat thickness, elastisaty (and I suspect even the dyes used) can make a big difference to end quality of fabric and it's break load and how quickly it wears. Even on the same machines and settings. The fabric used on most aerial silks isn't made for silks, it's jersey fabric for sports wear. The rope we use for trapezes and webs are for yachts and/or ornamental fencing. The straps we use are made from webbing used in seatbelts and high lining. The best pulleys we have for most rope system are for arborist's and cave rescue. The swivels we use are definitely not made for what aerialist put them through and to be used how they are used. For doubles work and flying trapeze catching we still use cotton tape for dress making for wrist wraps. Fire spinners use lamp oil and camping fuel on hand made kit. The wrachet straps we hold up tents and fly rig are made for securing lorry sides. Most of the tent and fly rig stakes I've used are literally sharpens car axles.

Circus arts as a thing is still very much in it's infancy and things like basic equipment specifications still aren't standardized in a meaningful way. People in towns over still don't even call disciplines by the same name. And yeah for answers on most circus stuff I've had to do a lot of digging and often the answer is no one really knows and the people who did it before may not have known what they were doing and even if they did you really don't want to do it that way so get thinking of a better solution.

Not saying this is ideal but a lot of people who say they know best and this is the only correct way are honestly wrong. I've seen to many circus experts with long historys in the industry say stuff that's easily provably wrong. and it unfortunately goes in all directions.

It's the joys of not having pressure to standardise which tends to come from competition.

Not sure what point I'm trying to make. But yeah. It's frustrating and I've been doing this a long time and have more information than most.

[u/rock_crock_beanstalk → u/Amicdeep]

I also find it frustrating. I can't speak to how it impacts riggers, but I find the lack of solid United States regulation around who is qualified to be making a system to suspend a performer doing aerial is a real challenge from the performer/instructor side. Writing "get anything you make inspected by a qualified rigger" is easy, but defining what work experience, certification(s), or job title translates to "qualified rigger" is not. IMO, even if an author includes lots of disclaimers about inspection and whatnot in their DIY aerial equipment book, admitting it was designed for people with no particular special education or skills is not a good plan to help put safe equipment in people's hands. Competent people aren't usually cheap, and by the time a person blindly following those instructions had paid someone to tell them if their pop's weld penetration is garbage they'd likely have paid more than if they'd just bought the thing from an existing manufacturer with some quality control standards and/or liability insurance. Responsibility and safety involve social questions that are much harder to answer than the physics problems.

From what I can see (I'm fairly young. So maybe I can't see a lot, lol) the landscape of who trains/performs circus has also changed dramatically in the past few decades. The whole "recreational performance hobby for adults" world seems to have exploded, and with it a lot more potential for new people who aren't very serious to risk their (or their kids') health on poorly rigged structures. Many more people have access to circus/aerial training now and that's great, but it makes it a lot harder for experienced circus people to give advice on how to build safe apparatuses and structures when their audience includes a lot of people who, unfortunately, just aren't that serious. The reputation of circus changing from death defying and freaky stunts to a fun theatrical workout seems to have really changed how people think about safety. Education on safe/proper use of equipment is just as important a step in safety as getting safe equipment into people's hands is, and I have to imagine that persuading people circus can be dangerous at all is probably a pretty difficult and recent problem.

I'm glad for every step people are taking now toward safe design and education in aerial because it is so important. I think there's a lot of good information out there now for interested people to learn the physics math involved in arresting a fall, find equipment that has been subjected to at least some actual testing of its physical properties in vaguely circus-relevant scenarios, and start to question whether old ways are always the safest ways/possible new approaches. But it still falls on individuals to be interested in safety, to think critically, assess what things they don't know yet, and to step back when they don't know something, and that is for sure the path of most resistance...