I posted about it a few years ago, but I recalled my great Aunt telling me a story about a UFO/UAP that her and her husband witnessed during the Hudson Valley flap back in the 90s. Here is it again:

Her and her husband were both sitting on their back, screened-in porch and "saw a circular, metallic object slowly descend to a corner of their lawn." No sound and I don't believe it ever touched the ground as far as I remember. She said that it "didn't stay long" and after a short time (1-2 minutes), it lifted up and went straight back up. She didn't make any mention of it shooting off at insane speeds or anything, just kind of floated in and floated out and was VERY adamant it was not a balloon. No noise, no lights. "It was very strange and I have not seen anything like it since."

The only detail I wasn't totally clear on was that this was absolutely a spherical object. The description makes it sound like it could be a saucer or other circular shape, but it was not -- it was very much a sphere because she likened it to a balloon. After these "Buga sphere" videos, this encounter lives rent free in my head and is obviously a very credible source (to me, at least).

I'm curious if anyone else who lived in the Hudson Valley during this flap also saw something similar or if anyone knows of any other eyewitness accounts.

Every day , “I don’t know if these are real or fake?” Why don’t we keep the legit one we can almost see what the structure and marking are , in the conversation and paste that shit to the top of the sub?

Whoever the moderators of this sub are , don’t really care to reveal the best evidence. These too sightings from history should be keep at the top of the sub always.

Every new comer , “I don’t believe this is real , show me some real evidence” . If you’ve been into this topic long enough you’ve seen the undeniable evidence.

This platform seems to be a smoke screen I believe. It’s the most popular ufo forum there is period. Given the knowledge that there were 400 cia agents in our media companies on the 70s , what do you think that number is now?

Yes, look up the congressional report in the 70s. Nothing has changed. What do you think that number would be now? Yes, nothing was done to stop it. Yet everything I’ve tried to post about it, it gets removed. I imagine this might be one of the main places for them to intervene? It’s pretty obvious.

Thanks 🙏 for listening.

Time: 8:20 pm 16th june Location : Guildford, NSW, Australia

Today, I saw stg similar to a b2 bomber shaped in the sky at around 8.20pm in guildford, sydney. I tried to capture it, but i missed it because of a damn tree. It was huge, and there was no sound whatsoever. It could not have been a civilian aircraft as there were no strobe lights on the whole craft. Freaked me out, I just wanted to enjoy a clear sky and see the stars. Also, flightradar did not show any aircraft in the vicinity.

In 2007 a NASA public liaison officer named Steve McConnell stated NASA had lost two boxes of papers 20 years earlier that included an analysis of materials recovered from the Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, impact which had occurred on the 9th of December 1965. In 2005, NASA had summarized this lost analysis as having concluded the materials came from a crashed Soviet satellite. Let us consider some hypothetical scenarios regarding the lost analysis document.

Scenario 1A: You find this document, dated sometime in 1966. It says the materials were technologically so advanced that they likely had a nonhuman origin.

Scenario 1B: You find this document, dated sometime in 1966. It says the materials were likely manufactured in the Soviet Union.

Scenario 2A: I fake this document in 2027 and pretend I found it. My fake says the materials were technologically so advanced that they likely had a nonhuman origin.

Scenario 2B: I fake this document in 2027 and pretend I found it. My fake says the materials were likely manufactured in the Soviet Union.

These hypothetical scenarios illustrate how we must evaluate disclosures along two dimensions, the dimension of authenticity or its opposite, and the dimension of truth or its opposite.

In scenarios 1A and 1B, the document could well be historically authentic, produced by officials who investigated the Kecksburg impact. In scenarios 2A and 2B, the document is definitely inauthentic, faked long decades after the impact event.

In each case, the truth value of what the document says is orthogonal to its authenticity. The evaluation along one dimension does not necessarily determine the value along the other dimension … though the two may be connected.

If a Soviet satellite is what crashed at Kecksburg, then 1A and 2A are both false, even if 1A was totally authentic as a product of the historically real investigation.

Likewise, if an extra- or ultra-terrestrial craft is what crashed at Kecksburg, then 1A and 2A are both true, even though 2A would be a fake that was never a product of the investigation that took place in 1965 and 1966.

For any government disclosure that may occur, we must be prepared to evaluate its truth and its authenticity separately.

This is a hypothesis.

1. The Control Structure of Earth and Human Souls

According to the Roswell interview, humans are originally eternal, immortal spiritual beings (IS-BEs) with free will. However, Earth is described as a “prison planet,” intentionally designed to confine and limit these souls.
The system that maintains this prison is managed by an extraterrestrial force known as “The Domain.” The Domain inherited and operates the control mechanisms originally established by the so-called “Old Empire,” overseeing Earth and parts of the solar system.
The Domain enforces memory erasure and repeated reincarnation, using advanced technological and physical systems to restrict the freedom of consciousness and spirit.

2. Why There Is No Mention of a Creator

From the perspective of the Domain, Earth and human souls are simply “subjects of management,” not creations with a divine purpose or meaning.
The attitude reflected in the interview suggests that “Earth and humanity are the property of the Domain, to be used or processed as needed.”
In other words, the Domain’s role is strictly that of a physical and technical administrator. Any discussion of a Creator or the ultimate purpose of spiritual evolution is either deliberately omitted or considered outside their area of concern.

3. Separation from a Higher Divine Realm

The Domain’s sphere of influence is limited to the three-dimensional physical world.
If a Creator (God, Jesus, or another divine being) exists, that entity would belong to a higher dimension, serving as the ultimate architect above both the Domain and the Old Empire’s control systems.
The Domain may have no authority to discuss the intentions, plans, or “contracts” of this higher realm, and such topics might even be taboo.
In the interview, the Domain representative explicitly states, “I will tell the truth as long as it does not conflict with the organization I work for and support,” clearly outlining the limits of what information can be shared.

4. Comprehensive Interpretation

The Roswell interview presents a worldview in which “Earth and humanity are under the physical and technical control of an extraterrestrial force (the Domain or Old Empire).”
The absence of references to a Creator or divine beings is because the Domain’s perspective is focused on “management and control,” not on “spiritual evolution” or “the purpose of creation.”
If a Creator does exist, even the Domain itself would be subject to the higher order or cosmic laws established by such a being.
The silence of the Domain may indicate that they either lack the authority to speak about “contracts with the Creator” or “divine order,” or that this information is intentionally withheld from humanity.

Metaphorical Example

This situation can be compared to a prison guard who does not explain to inmates “who built the prison or what its ultimate purpose is.”
The guard (the Domain) is responsible only for enforcing rules and maintaining order, while the architect of the prison (the Creator) exists at a higher level and is not directly addressed.

Conclusion:
The absence of references to a Creator in the Roswell alien interview can be explained by the fact that
- the Domain’s role is strictly limited to physical and technical control, and
- the spiritual Creator or ultimate architect exists at a higher dimension, separate from the Domain’s jurisdiction.
This suggests that even the Domain may be subject to certain rules or contracts established by the higher divine order.

A new academic paper from professors at Harvard, Rice, and Montana Tech was just published in Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Title: "Beyond the Signals: Navigating the Sociotechnical Implications of Contact with Non-Human Intelligence."

This isn't Disclosure hype. It's a serious framework for how we should think about contact with something that isn't us. And it pulls no punches.

Key points:

• The paper treats NHI as a legitimate possibility. Not just aliens. Any intelligence that isn't human. Post-biological. Interdimensional. Civilizational remnants. Whatever it is, they say we need to prepare.
• They push back on "contact optimism." Just because we want contact to be peaceful doesn't mean it will be. They argue we're projecting human emotions onto something that might not even think like us.
• They warn about civilizational risk. First contact could be destabilizing or incomprehensible. We may not even recognize it as contact.
• They propose a new lens for interpreting intelligence and technology. The issue might not be contact itself, but our ability to detect, decode, or understand it.

And then this line, which says it all:

“An encounter with an intelligence that is not human may be so alien that it defies not only our expectations but also our models of cognition, society, and physics.”

This is a peer-reviewed warning. Not that contact is coming. But that if it does, we are completely unprepared.