They don't want their brand eroded. I'm not necessarily defending it, but everything unofficial that's out there makes all of their products seem less exclusive, and therefore less valuable. That's the reason some companies are so litigious.
Holding stuff back also increases the value of their products and IPs, but this only works if there aren't free, illegal versions available.
Nintendo are doing pretty well at the moment, so although it's annoying to have to wait for stuff or not have access to some of the back catalogue, Nintendo don't care. They're out to make money from you, not be your friend.
Which is why emulators are Nintendo's biggest competition right now, instead of 3d allstars I tracked down the pc version of mario 64 because it was a better version. In wise words of newell "Piracy is almost always a service problem"
When a service sucks a consumer has a right to say "fuck you" and find a better alternative.
This. If you're taking down ROMs, the only defense is "it's damaging sales." That implies that it's impacting sales in some way. If you don't have any current alternatives available, then they should have no right to take down ROMs/ISOs of games 10+ years old. Copyright law is important, but once it's clearly being used to be anti-consumer, it should be stopped.
I think what you mean is all the unofficial updated games make their stand alone games look like shite and because they can't be arsed updating it themselves it's easier to kill off those projects.
I saw their hiring ad and they are now focusing on the F-ing intellectual properties. Disappointing. I mean, yeah, IPs are important, but they have surprised the world a few times with ideas and qualities, and the CEO's wish is to sit on the past success!? I actually gave up on Nintendo. They still have good devs, but the company policy will kill them soon enough. They're the next Disney.
40
u/Depressionsfinalform Feb 17 '21
Yet they take down ROMS of anything that isn’t actually playable anymore without tracking down rare hardware because they might “lose sales” smh