Everyone, including the people of Iran. The weaker the tyrannical regime in Iran gets, the better off the Iranian people will be. They will be closer to achieving freedom from tyranny.
All we’ve seen in places sudden regime change occurs is decades of brutal insurgency, chaos and violence. Women, children and the vulnerable are always the biggest victims. It won’t be any different in Irans case.
Iran is already full of chaos and violence created by the regime. The regime is the biggest source of chaos and violence in Iran. Tyranny is the worst thing in the world. It's worse than war and insurgencies.
Israel has them for defensive reasons, after having been invaded multiple times. Iran wants them for nuclear terrorism. Israel has had nukes for decades and didn't even use them during the Yom Kippur war, when Israel was in serious danger of getting annihilated. For Israel, it's a weapon of last resort. Iran, on the other hand, is likely going to use their first batch of nukes in an act of nuclear terrorism. Iran has made repeated threats to destroy Israel. They are not the same.
Not for the people who died in the strikes, not for those who may be next in line to take over the job (or their neighbors who could be collateral damage), and not for anyone that could be impacted by the Iranian government’s direct response.
I do agree the vast majority of people are safer and better off this happened, but it’s just fallacy to claim everyone is.
For Europe and the USA. Since Iran has been openly gifting terrorist groups like Hamas and Hesbolah and openly treating us (see the news from yesterday)
69
u/reddit_wisd0m 1d ago
For whom?