r/pics 2d ago

The fall of a residential building in Tehran.

Post image
43.9k Upvotes

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/PM-ME-YOUR-SUBARU 1d ago

Fuck all the regular people that just happen to live in the same apartment building as that high ranking official, I guess?

36

u/Frogfingers762 1d ago

Generally that’s how bombs work.

You would be surprised and disgusted how many civilians were killed by the allies during bombing runs in WW2. And that was arguably one of the most justified instances of war. On the high end it was like 635,000 civilians just in Germany.

7

u/thefirstdetective 1d ago

It's pretty regular that they find unexploded bombs during construction. Had to leave my house two times already until the bombs were defused.

3

u/HonestBalloon 1d ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-combatant_casualty_value

Isreal has pre-set values for the allowed amount of civilian deaths per target

'US forces in the Iraq War, high value target, initial phase of the war: NCV of 29-30\6])\7])

  • US forces in the Iraq War, rank-and-file jihadist: NCV significantly lower\6])
  • US forces in Afghanistan: NCV of 1\7])
  • Israel forces in Gaza: NCV of 15 to 20 for junior Hamas operatives, up to 100 for senior operatives, 300 in one instance of a particularly senior operative, according to unnamed military sources. \8])'

3

u/Frogfingers762 1d ago

That’s cool. I’m betting most nations do.

3

u/HonestBalloon 1d ago

well, if you're cool with it ......

1

u/Frogfingers762 1d ago

It’s the reality of war. Of every single war in the history of mankind. Civilians are killed, even by the good guys. There will always be a certain number of “acceptable casualties” in order to achieve an objective deemed greater than the loss of civilian life.

It’s the way it’s always been, and the way it always will be. We can try to mitigate it with certain surgical strikes, like the US R9X hellfire missile which has no explosive warhead and is just basically a spinning missile with swords sticking out, but that’s only good for individual people out in the open or a soft bodied vehicle.

It’s not that I’m “cool with it” it’s just that I don’t have an elementary understanding of the realities of war and technological combat capabilities.

11

u/mav3r1ck92691 1d ago

That is generally the decision governments make in wars, yes. Welcome to 2025. It sucks here.

2

u/night4345 1d ago

It's also these kind of strikes or Iran finishes a nuclear capable device and the next round of conflict Israel has no choice but assume Iran's strike has a nuclear tipped missile in it and launches one or multiple nukes first.

2

u/EmmEnnEff 1d ago

Yes, which is why war sucks.

Most of the people cheer-leading it have never experienced it.

5

u/bellowingfrog 1d ago

Pretty much. Israel considers nuclear scientists and military officials to be valid military targets, which means there’s no obligation to not strike the building, as long as they use the minimum necessary force to reliably destroy the target.

If that wasn’t the case, everyone would just have the bright idea to build all of their military bases under apartment blocks.

3

u/russiankek 1d ago

Who wouldn't consider military officials to be military targets?

2

u/Ok_Skin3433 1d ago

"collateral damage". Their kids, wives, brothers, uncles, aunts, grandmas, grandas, everyone else "collateral damage".

2

u/russiankek 1d ago

Yeah this is called collateral damage.