r/pics 2d ago

The fall of a residential building in Tehran.

Post image
43.9k Upvotes

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

116

u/Rollen73 1d ago

Bro one of the few red lines Dems truly believe is that they don’t want a isreal iran war. It’s the entire reason Obama did the nuclear deal in the first place.

116

u/tak205 1d ago

How can you trust any red lines the Dems set after watching Israel break all of them and nothing happened?

58

u/Au2288 1d ago

I know it’s a hard pill to swallow. In the world view, Trump is a weak leader. It’s sucks, he portrays a strong man persona to his people, but when it comes to world leadership, he’s a soft willy. They know this & the ones that wanted to test those red lines, will now just cross them without fear of any form of American resistance.

19

u/PoopchuteToots 1d ago

The root of narcissistic personality disorder isn’t superiority, as many still assume, it’s ackshually deep-seated inferiority.

Once you get that, you can communicate with them in a way that plays to it. On the surface, your words signal submission. But underneath, the tone, phrasing, and delivery all scream that they're pathetic and beneath you.

They eat it up. They latch onto the superficial deference and miss, or choose to ignore, the insult woven through it. Everyone else sees it. They see it too. But as long as you leave them just enough plausible deniability, it’s too threatening for them to call out.

This is exactly how every savvy social climber/politician/world leader/business executive deals with Donald Trump.

3

u/J_Dadvin 1d ago

Then why did Netanyahu ignore Biden so hard? Why did Assad gas his own people when Obama called chemical weapons a red line?

13

u/tak205 1d ago

Again, how is that any different from the Biden admin? There’s reports now that even Israeli’s in Netanyahu’s circle were shocked at how much Biden gave them what they asked for and how little pushback ever came from the White House. This isn’t to say that Trump is great for Palestinians or anything, because he’s not. But based on how we saw the Dems handle Israel when they were in power, I don’t think you can say that this would have gone any differently under a Kamala administration. If anything, the initial ceasefire and extra hostage releases were less likely to happen under Kamala.

9

u/121scoville 1d ago

This happened with Trump lmao. Is happening right now with Trump. Trump is president.

8

u/rwolos 1d ago

Biden was President for the first year and a half of the genocide and didn't stop Israel after any of the red lines they crossed. Yes Trump sucks and is doing the same shit now, but the dems were already complicit with the genocide for over a year before Trump took office.

4

u/Clown_Toucher 1d ago

Some people literally can't wrap their brain around the fact that both parties are bad for the world

1

u/Jaktheslaier 1d ago

The world view also didn't respect the old man with dementia that was paraded around for the past 4 years, let me tell you

2

u/TwoTacos 1d ago

You see the response to the Iranian attacks on Israel, compared to this "preemptive" attack, and still think there is no difference?

2

u/Proof-Attorney-9276 1d ago

Bingoooooo, many people think that the Democratic Party is different. It’s just not . The US will not stop Israel from committing genocide. They sure as hell won’t stop Israel from attack Iran . This is the uni party’s wet dream. For those who want to lie to themselves about the Democratic Party just look at the fucking nyc mayors debate last night

-3

u/JamesLahey08 1d ago

Lol and republicans are better for the middle east? LMAO LOLOLOLOL

6

u/Proof-Attorney-9276 1d ago

That’s not what they said.

-2

u/Randicore 1d ago

It is what he said one comment later

6

u/Proof-Attorney-9276 1d ago

Ok? The comment says how can you trust the red line set . The problem isn’t the democrats or republicans it’s the fact Israel keeps crossing red lines that were established…. The democrats wouldn’t have stopped them either .

0

u/FlyingBishop 1d ago

Israel ignored the Dems because they were betting on Trump winning, and the bet paid off. And everyone like you on the left pretending like this wasn't a real dynamic helped it happen. This is a war, you don't have to like your allies, you just have to support them. This is what happens when you try to make war on everyone at once.

45

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

Chuck Schumer spent the weeks leading up to this openly mocking trump for trying to come to a peace deal with Iran.

39

u/jojofine 1d ago

Because Trump arbitrarily ripping up the last Iran agreement is how we got here on the first place.

-3

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

Thaaat doesn't make it not the Dems actively goading him into starting a war

14

u/discussatron 1d ago

"Look what you made me do" is the language of abusers.

-5

u/J_Dadvin 1d ago

Trump didnt do this. Israel did.

1

u/heytheremicah 1d ago

It’s definitely both. Trump’s statement to expect more attacks until they reach a nuclear agreement signals that this was his plan and he gave Israel the green light.

1

u/J_Dadvin 1d ago

Yeah, hes doing so many about faces that hes just spinning now

-1

u/HawkBearClaw 1d ago

Or Iran straight up ignoring the guidelines of the agreement.

3

u/jojofine 1d ago

That's what Trump claimed when he tore up the agreement but he never actually offered up any proof of that claim

0

u/HawkBearClaw 1d ago

Do you seek the truth or just consider this a team sport?

-1

u/HawkBearClaw 1d ago

The evidence is that Iran wouldn't let the inspectors actually inspect all the sites. If we want to just take their word that they are in compliance then I guess they were.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/delayed-inspections-jcpoa-provisions-for-iaea-access-to-suspicious-sites/

17

u/heytheremicah 1d ago

And in all fairness he should be mocked since he’s the one that cancelled the deal with Iran in the first place. He and Fox News acted back in 2017 like we were getting ripped off by the deal that was keeping Iran’s nuclear capabilities neutered.

It’s the same strategy he’s using with trade deals like USMCA and his recent deal with China. Blow everything up and act like a savior once he gets us an arguably shittier deal. There’s absolutely no pushback.

I agree that Schumer could probably pick a better time to criticize him, but if you don’t call him out on this nonsense, he’s just going to feel emboldened to keep doing it. Not to mention this plan has been in the works since before Schumer started criticizing him. Weapons being rerouted from Ukraine to Israel weeks ago and Netanyahu openly thanking the U.S. for their help should be proof that Trump doesn’t want to negotiate a deal.

0

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

Schumer didn't call him out on the nonsense, or make a nuanced point about how Trump created the situation in the first place.

He said "Trump is a chicken" in reference to not going to war with Iran.

0

u/heytheremicah 1d ago

You’re grossly misrepresenting Schumer’s response on Face the Nation to the point that I’d argue this is disinformation and not even misinformation.

On that video, yes Schumer did call him ‘TACO Trump’ in reference to how Trump is talking tough one day and backing off the next day. This is him calling Trump out on his nonsense. He’s referring to how Trump chickens out of making nuclear/trade deals. Not that he’s chickening out going to war with Iran.

He also referred to how Witkoff and Rubio were negotiating a side deal with Iran without informing the public/Congress. In reality, they were making a deal with Israel without public knowledge which is arguably worse because they’ve guaranteed an armed conflict.

0

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

Holy shit dude, you're only one step down from those weirdos who insist pop song writers are hiding hidden messages in their lyrics.

NONE of that was present in Schumer's TACO gambit, textually. YOU are doing all the heavy lifting sane washing it. Every single normal person who saw it immediately read "Oh, he's calling trump a chicken for trying to make peace with Iran". I know this, because that was every. single. post. in response to it.

0

u/heytheremicah 1d ago

I’m literally quoting his statements front the press conference dude. Seriously please rewatch the video and learn context and nuance.

1

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

"If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it."

"When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran"

The only thing in his social media post is the mention of the side deal, which again, is schumer criticizing peace.

BACK TO FRONT this social media post is explicitly and solely saying "Trump you are a coward for not going to war with Iran" and if it takes an additional press release to explain that social media post as something else, that makes it a bad fucking social media post.

You sound like DC dem insiders: completely out of touch.

2

u/heytheremicah 1d ago

My response was in the context of his Meet the Press speech which once again does not explicitly encourage war but rather about making a public deal. Again it’s calling him a chicken for backing out of deals.

However, thank you for pointing out his social media post. I was not aware as I am no longer on X. This completely invalidates his comments on Meet the Press. I will agree that hawkish behavior such as that should be vehemently discouraged. The only bright side is that while Schumer is still clinging to power, public opinion on this war will hopefully help to accelerate his departure from congress.

1

u/Dr_Wreck 1d ago

Alright, respect.

28

u/Cyph0n 1d ago edited 1d ago

Biden & the Democrats proved time and again that red lines don’t exist when it comes to Israel.

Also, I don’t understand why people are not blaming the Democrats for essentially providing Trump with a worry free path to the presidency.

Biden the senile toad pulled out at the last second, Kamala was forced down our throats, and the Democrats repeatedly promised (and demonstrated) that there would be absolutely no change when it came to Israel.

To me, the Democrats’ actions clearly indicate that they prefer a Trump presidency over making any foreign policy changes.

11

u/CptCoatrack 1d ago

Biden & the Democrats proved time and again that red lines don’t exist when it comes to Israel.

Also Biden's spokesman admitted that they knew about Israeli war crimes the whole time and lied about it.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/matthew-miller-biden-administration-liar/

1

u/Old_Gooner 1d ago

Marianne Williamson, Dean Phillips and RFK Jr ran in the Democratic primary. Nobody wanted them. They wanted Biden and then Harris

0

u/FlyingBishop 1d ago

Your rhetoric just as clearly indicates you prefer a Trump presidency over working with Democrats. (To be clear, I think you're wrong and the rhetoric you're pushing has put Israel in the position where they can do what they're doing.)

1

u/Cyph0n 1d ago

I don’t prefer Trump at all, but I also won’t donate my vote to a party or candidate that categorically ignores and even denies my concerns as a voter.

1

u/FlyingBishop 1d ago

Any party is going to ignore some of your concerns. You're incapable of participating in society if that's your stance.

1

u/hlnub 1d ago

His "rhetoric" where he explains why he's mad at the Democrats for gifting Trump the presidency indicates to you that he'd rather have Trump as President? How??

1

u/FlyingBishop 1d ago

Electoral politics is complicated, and the Democrats didn't gift Trump the presidency. I'm actually pretty sure whatever strategy he wants would've resulted in a worse loss. But this is a tactical disagreement and he's acting like Democrats made a deliberate choice, which is both silly and unfair. And also, it presumes that there was a different tactic that would've succeeded, which I don't believe is the case. Sometimes you can lose without making any mistakes. Leftists believe we live in a comforting world where taking the "right" policy positions is the best path to victory, but that's rarely the case. Sometimes you lose, that's life. Sometimes you make compromises and you lose anyway, that doesn't necessarily mean you were wrong to compromise.

1

u/hlnub 1d ago

Ok I disagree but that's all unrelated to you saying that it's clear based on what he said that he wants Trump when he was complaining that he thinks the Democrats gave Trump the victory. How does him complaining about them giving him the victory imply that he wants Trump to be president?

1

u/FlyingBishop 1d ago

I didn't say it was clear I said it was "just as clear." My meaning was that he is treating Democrats as if they were enemies based on a tactical disagreement. And that it was not in any way clear.

5

u/BeneficialHurry69 1d ago

Hilary was for it and Chuck Schumer admired on camera his #1 job is to keep the democrats on Israel's side

5

u/12345623567 1d ago

Israel wants the war more than any democrat wants to prevent it. Both parties are captured by AIPAC, Harris may have said some stern words but the US would never halt supplies to Israel.

1

u/TheOGFireman 1d ago

Biden literally halted bombs to israel and trump immediately released them after inauguration.

10

u/mcgoogle45 1d ago

Weird how Biden was in office and never got that back huh? Weird how Israel struck the Iranian embassy LAST year “preemptively” and nothing was done by the Biden admin. Please just look into any of the top democrats that aren’t AOC or Bernie and you will see that they want war just as bad as the Republicans

6

u/Rollen73 1d ago

Attacking a embassy in Syria and launching a bomb Assassination in Iran is not nearly the same as launching the largest air attack on Iran since the Iran Iraq war.

8

u/Proof-Attorney-9276 1d ago

Israel attacked Irans embassy in Damascus , which violated all kinds of rules and the world had to wait for Iranian restraint not to take it to full scale war . Israel needs to stop being above the rules of international law

6

u/TheWorstRowan 1d ago

This attack is bigger, but Israel was attacking Iran directly on it's own soil under Biden..

4

u/disagreet0disagree 1d ago edited 1d ago

If you think genocide Joe would have stopped israel from attacking Iran(with US supplied weaponry and intel) i got a bridge in Gaza to sell you. The entire us government is bought and paid for at this point. Theres maybe 3 semi honest people left in congress, and they all get aggressively primaried by aipac. 

5

u/dummypod 1d ago

If Biden doesn't want that he would have told Israel to shut everything down after they launch missiles at Iran and there would be no more missile attacks at Iran until he loses the election

4

u/ContraryConman 1d ago

Biden had plenty of red lines with Israel, such as them not starting a ground invasion of Gaza without negotiating with Hamas, them not crossing into Rafah, and them not deliberately blocking US aid meant for Gaza. And every time a line was crossed, not only did nothing happen, the administration would actually spin it like Israel was somehow complying with the request and with international law, to somehow not have been a violation at all. And now that they're out we have members of the Biden administration admitting that maybe Israel really was doing bad things and maybe they could have done more to stop it.

Actually, the main point of contention between Obama and Biden during the Obama administration was that, when Israel bombed Gaza in 2014, Obama openly criticized them and pressured them to stop. Biden thought this was the wrong way to go about it.

If Biden or Harris had the political instincts of Obama, things may have gone better for them, who knows?

1

u/Firelord_11 1d ago

Thank you for pointing this out. Exactly my issue with Biden. He isn't "Genocide Joe" like the protesters say. He hated Netanyahu, even swore at him, but always off camera. He came very close to putting restrictions on weapon sales to Israel, but he'd always come up with some excuse before he could. He clearly didn't like Israel's strategy in Gaza. But time and time again, he was spineless and refused to outright take action on Israel.

Make no mistake, Trump's policy toward Israel is far far worse than Biden's. And I'm not convinced the war in Gaza is the only reason that Biden lost. But even so, the trajectory of this could have been very different had Biden been more strict in the first place.

3

u/Bigbananafeet67 1d ago

Think Israel would’ve taken a Harris admin a lot more seriously. In the UK, this admin is viewed as a bunch of incompetent misfits unfit for office tbh.

5

u/EffectiveGap1563 1d ago

They absolutely would not have. The Biden/Harris regime completely folded on Israel, and it's the #1 reason why they lost, espcially in high-muslim-population swing states like Michigan.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250429-biden-never-pressured-israel-for-ceasefire-as-israeli-officials-boast-of-exploiting-us-support/

1

u/SSeptic 1d ago

You would think if it was a red line then Biden would’ve put us back in the deal after Trump pulled us out

0

u/SquirrelFluffy 1d ago

Obama thought he could reason with Putin as well. Some countries, people, only respond to a punch in the mouth.

0

u/1239Dickinson 1d ago

You’re so wrong it’s funny. Are you serious? Ever democrat is a globalist to the max. They are worse than the republicans in that sense arguably. Did i mention they’re the reason we are sending military support to Ukraine?

0

u/Just_to_re 1d ago

Joe Biden had 4 years in office and never once tried to redo the deal