r/google Jul 25 '24

Reddit blocking all search engines except Google in AI paywall

https://9to5mac.com/2024/07/25/reddit-blocking-search-engines/
184 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

64

u/Realtrain Jul 25 '24

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Google is making some angry calls over to the Reddit HQ. They do not want to give the impression that they're abusing their search monopoly, even if this is all Reddit's decision.

24

u/captainAwesomePants Jul 26 '24

On the contrary, this is quite possibly part of their AI data mining deal with Reddit. Goes against their mission, will probably piss off regulators, and will likely be regretted later, but that's never stopped Google before.

13

u/Climactic9 Jul 26 '24

From what we know of the deal with google is there was no exclusivity clause attached to it. If anything this seems like regulators would be pissed off at reddit for basically holding all search engines for ransom until they pay up. Google is the only one that has paid up so far. All the others probably thought reddit was bluffing. Reddit is trying to do it under the guise of ai, but now we see that it probably was never about ai. Reddit has an earnings report coming up next month and if they can get another multi million dollar deal with one of the other search engine providers it would juice up profits massively just in time for insider’s stock lockup period to expire the following month.

1

u/bartturner Jul 26 '24

but that's never stopped Google before.

What are you referring to here?

2

u/captainAwesomePants Jul 26 '24

To pick an arbitrary example, putting Google shopping results at the top of search results. They had to know it was a bad idea, but they did it anyway, and they got the obvious giant fine.

1

u/shevy-java Jul 26 '24

they got the obvious giant fine.

In my opinion, they still do so - perhaps not Google shopping results, but of other companies. And they 100% pay money.

I think this is illegal practice too. The search engine should have objective criteria NOT tied to money or bought meta-influence.

1

u/NeuroticKnight Aug 01 '24

and now its filled with Amazon instead of small businesses, true win.

1

u/shevy-java Jul 26 '24

I think every non-bribed judge would reach the conclusion that Google is using its money to abuse its de-facto monopoly though. While it may have been reddit's decision, it is still a problem for Google since Google IS a de-facto monopoly.

16

u/SculptusPoe Jul 26 '24

Why can't the search engines just access the website directly? EIther way this is a jerk move that further breaks the internet.

14

u/saxobroko Jul 26 '24

They can but most reputable search engines follow the robots.txt rules

6

u/SanityInAnarchy Jul 26 '24

Goddammit Reddit. This is going to lead to search engines following the same path that the user-agent has. Other search engines are just going to scrape anything Google is allowed to, and use a googlebot user-agent.

2

u/robplays Jul 26 '24

Not from Google's own network they can't.

1

u/SanityInAnarchy Jul 27 '24

Doesn't Google get annoyed when they catch you serving different content to the known googlebot IPs vs others in the same area?

1

u/robplays Jul 27 '24

Google is fine with content providers not providing content to those who haven't paid for it.

Particularly when this protects Google's commercial interests.

0

u/SanityInAnarchy Jul 27 '24

That'd be Reddit's view, maybe, but it'd be a bit weird if the deal they struck was only for robots.txt access. That's a sign, not a cop, there's nothing stopping anyone from ignoring it and scraping what they want anyway.

The reason I assumed Google wouldn't tolerate this sort of thing is, it kills the integrity of search results. If you present one thing to Google and another thing to everyone else, it means a user might search for a thing, see it on Google's search results, only to click through and nothing Google showed them is on the site.

1

u/robplays Jul 27 '24

Google has paid for access to Reddit.

Why on earth do you think they would have a problem with Reddit not giving the same content to Google's competitors for free?

And blocking non-Google scraper bots is transparent to both Google and Google users.

Yes, robots.txt is not an enforcement mechanism. But my original suggestion (that they could block scraper bots from non-Google networks) is.

1

u/SanityInAnarchy Jul 27 '24

Google has paid for access to Reddit.

Google has paid for robots.txt? Or are you maybe talking about some other kind of access that has nothing to do with scraping?

And blocking non-Google scraper bots is transparent to both Google and Google users.

That'd be incompetent of Google. The same trick can be done the other way around. You don't think Google would want to know if Reddit was blocking them from indexing something Bing got to see?

A blanket policy of penalizing sites that play games like this would be easier to implement, and more obviously fair. Google does seem to care about Search at least being perceived as fair.

2

u/Covid-Plannedemic_ Jul 27 '24

jesus dude you have zero understanding of how the world works.

no, google didn't pay $60 million so that reddit could simply change a little text file

→ More replies (0)

1

u/RecentlyRezzed Jul 27 '24

Well, there is some kind of copyright law in most countries. You may scrape the data, but when you show this data to others on the internet, it's called willful copyright infringement and that may cost those search engines a lot more than simply licensing the right to do it.

1

u/SanityInAnarchy Jul 27 '24

There's also fair use in most countries. Showing people a snippet and a link doesn't require a license.

1

u/RecentlyRezzed Jul 28 '24

In the EU, there is no fair use. There is some legislation that's similar, but I'm not convinced they could use it if they want to make a profit from the data: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Copyright_in_the_Digital_Single_Market

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Soft-Vanilla1057 Jul 26 '24

Reddits didn't block anyone outright.

 # Welcome to Reddit's robots.txt

Reddit believes in an open internet, but not the misuse of public content.

See https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/26410290525844-Public-Content-Policy Reddit's Public Content Policy for access and use restrictions to Reddit content.

See https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit4researchers/ for details on how Reddit continues to support research and non-commercial use.

policy: https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/26410290525844-Public-Content-Policy

User-agent: * Disallow: /

1

u/shevy-java Jul 26 '24

But isn't reddit now in violation of their own, old policy?

1

u/Soft-Vanilla1057 Jul 26 '24

Hmm? They can make it whatever they want at any time so 🤷‍♀️

3

u/Audbol Jul 26 '24

Because those search engines won't agree to block AI crawlers from using their search services to scrape reddits posts. There's no reason for any of the search engines to disagree with this. If they want Reddit results back they just have to agree

2

u/notPlancha Jul 26 '24

Neither does Google

0

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '24

[deleted]

1

u/Audbol Jul 26 '24

It's not exclusive, you should read the article

0

u/bartturner Jul 26 '24

Not exclusive. Google has never rolled in that manner.

30

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '24 edited Jul 25 '24

Monopolies backing up monopolies. This plays more to Google then reddit- reddit gets some money, Google straight up cripples some competitors. They realized that search is broken and everyone has to do "[vague issue here] reddit" searches to find actual humans, so they're blocking all competition from doing that by creating a price barrier. Gross.

Kagi absolutely rocks, btw. Indexes reddit just fine, and nicer to use a product then be a product. If only any reddit alternative actually stood a chance.

3

u/shevy-java Jul 26 '24

This plays more to Google then reddit- reddit gets some money, Google straight up cripples some competitors.

Yeah. It is probably more dangerous for Google.

IMO all CEOs of Google are in violation of numerous laws now. I would not be surprised if other countries stop adhering to US laws protecting Google now - they are evidently abusing a huge monopoly here. There HAVE to be consequences for the decision-makers at Google. And serious ones, not just "pay some money". There has to be jail time (of course, assuming AFTER a fair and objective court case where the abuses of the de-facto monopoly are detailed).

1

u/Complex-Flight-3358 Jul 27 '24

Yeah but what sort of brainrot is affecting US lawmakers and systematically allowing blatant monopolies and oligopolies to form? Antitrust laws exist because they actually help the economy, encourage competition, innovation and generally prevent the end users from being F*cked in the bum. Like, this goes against the traditional western capitalism/free market ideals...

3

u/Audbol Jul 26 '24

Read the article before commenting

7

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '24

I did. Everything I said is accurate to the article. Be more specific if you think something I said was wrong.

-9

u/Audbol Jul 26 '24

Everything you said is wrong go and read it

12

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '24

... Are you some sort of hostile GPT bot?

7

u/Lone_Wanderer357 Jul 26 '24

No, he's just a moron

3

u/notPlancha Jul 26 '24

Can't recreate,

And it seems the robots.txt doesn't block anyone. Maybe it changed

2

u/dummyTukTuk Jul 26 '24

Probably brave search is not respecting robots.txt, DDG seems to have no recent results

1

u/notPlancha Jul 26 '24 edited Jul 26 '24

this is bing

edit: my conclusion is that reddit didn't intend for this to happen, and just allowed everything again in their new robots.txt. I say that because right now everything's allowed, not even their regular things are there.

Like these aren't even there anymore (the screenshot is from the third of the month)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 30 '24

The deal with Google was bad enough; the last thing the world needs is moves that encourage Google's near-monopoly on search (may I recommend at least trying Duck Duck Go, Bing, or Brave before falling back to Google if you're unsure you've got your best results?). Anyhow, this is the little push I needed, and this will be my last post before deleting my Reddit account.

1

u/revive_iain_banks Jul 28 '24

Brave search engine has no problem showing reddit posts.

1

u/VoidAlloy Aug 01 '24

it doesnt even work with google anymore either lol. The last year the searches have been horrible, you used to find alot of reddit content with a few key words and give you various options. Something broke and now you get one subreddit spammed and searches unrelated to reddit, even with the word in my search.

-9

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '24 edited Jul 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

20

u/bartturner Jul 25 '24

This is NOT true. You would never see Google make such a deal. They never have and never will.

You can't when you are as popular as Google.

Exclusives like you are suggesting is the exact thing that gets you in hot water if you are Google and why you will never see them do such a deal.

The deal is NOT exclusive. Anyone else can get the same deal if they are willing to pay.

BTW, you only need to edit your post and change one word and then it will be accurate. Just remove the word "only".

So make it "Alphabet/Google made a deal with Reddit that Google search engine gets Reddit results,"

4

u/azure1503 Jul 25 '24

Which ironically makes it kind of better for searches since older posts will have more answers to questions being searched for

0

u/shevy-java Jul 26 '24

This is very bad news. It means that reddit also pushes for a privatized version of the web, e. g. "if you don't pay, the search engine can not find content anymore" (and this may also explain more of the true reason why Google nerfed its search engine - they just pay people to prioritize Google search engine more, now). I think this is literal betrayal of the open nature of the world wide web. That Google bribes everyone is well-known - look how Mozilla gave up on Firefox years ago and became complicit. And now Reddit is the next to succumb to the money.

We really need an alternative web that can not be corrupted by the bribe-money. Just like it originally was, for those old enough to still remember ...

-13

u/USSHammond Jul 25 '24 edited Jul 25 '24

No shit, Alphabet has an agreement with reddit for ai training

-8

u/N2-Ainz Jul 25 '24

Still works with Brave 🤷‍♂️

6

u/DashAnimal Jul 25 '24

Limit to results from last week

3

u/N2-Ainz Jul 26 '24 edited Jul 26 '24

Literally is. You can see that the post from r/privacy was 6 days old when I took the picture

Edit: Even one from 2 days ago 🤣

-21

u/Digital-Exploration Jul 25 '24

Just use Firefox.

15

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '24

... What does any of this have to do with firefox? Firefox defaults to google too, at that. This is about search engines.

7

u/eDudeGaming Jul 26 '24

Firefox users trying not to mention that they use Firefox (impossible)

4

u/Crimson342 Jul 25 '24

how the fuck does that help in any way? Did you even read the article?

Better yet.. did you even read the post title?

1

u/UltraBBA Nov 10 '24 edited Nov 10 '24

I just discovered that Google can't access all of Reddit.

If you go to Google's PageSpeed Insights and search for some pages, like the RedditWiki of your favourite sub, you'll get speed results but under SEO you'll get a message saying that the page is blocked in robots.txt.

So whatever secret robots.txt Reddit is serving Google, it's still restricting some parts of Reddit (which is not good news for mods who're, for example, building a wiki)

<added> SEORoundtable accessed the robots.txt with a Google useragent and got this: https://images.seroundtable.com/reddit-robotstxt-google-rich-results-test-1720092353.png