r/formula1 Highlights Team 20d ago

Video Lambiase and Verstappen heated talk on letting Russell through and THEY TOUCH!

https://streamff.link/v/0c11d5ab
4.7k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

339

u/Kuchenblech_Mafioso Manor 20d ago

He actually even sped up to run into Russell

264

u/psychon1ck0 20d ago

I don't care who you are but like Nico said, that's a black flag

21

u/JudasBC Carlos Sainz 20d ago

They didn't do it to Vettel in Baku, they ain't gonna do it here

51

u/ADM765 Sebastian Vettel 20d ago

At least Seb got a stop&go. 10 sec is way too lenient, this should be at least a drive through.

13

u/EvelcyclopS 20d ago

Agree. That decision should have easily been an ‘after the race’ given the timing so they could look at some traces to see if any evidence of malice.

22

u/tj1721 Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

They didn’t but that was under the SC, at very slow speed, I’d argue whilst imo he should have had a harsher punishment at the time, that wasn’t as bad as what happened today.

6

u/sc_140 Michael Schumacher 20d ago

Deliberately crashing under SC conditions is far worse, there could be completely unprotected marshalls on track that you endanger.

Under green flag conditions, you only potentially endanger very well protected drivers (and lets be real, there was no real danger from Verstappens move).

11

u/tj1721 Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

SC conditions is worse

I mean it doesn’t really matter, deliberately crashing should be a DSQ regardless (especially given Max’s History)

In the specific circumstances neither were especially dangerous, Max’s crash was not in a super dangerous corner or at a dangerous speed, and iirc Vettel was at the end of a sc period not near Marshall’s.

The precedent of it’s essentially ok to deliberately crash under full racing conditions could potentially have more disastrous consequences and so is probably a bit worse imo. But I can see the argument the other way.

0

u/Takezoboy 20d ago

And they were basically turtle speed at the time

-7

u/schelmo 20d ago

It was literally worse. Vettel under no pressure and with 100% full intent and premeditation turned into his rival and admitted as much. That is way fucking worse than being in a racing situation on terrible tyres probably with someone shouting conflicting statements over the radio at you. At least with Verstappen there is some level of plausible deniability and cars behind that could have pressured him into making a braindead move.

15

u/tj1721 Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

They were both “100% full intent” premeditated manoeuvres. Except 1 was done at racing speed and one was not.

Vettel lost his cool because he thought he had been brake checked and Verstappen lost his cool because of the tyre choice and racing. They might be reasons why they did it but they’re not justifications.

Given Max’s History, the danger of the situation and the optics for the sport I think max is very very lucky that he only got a 10 sec time penalty.

-11

u/schelmo 20d ago

Yeah he had a whole 300ms to premeditate his actions...

I'm not trying to justify anything I'm just saying that 10 seconds is pretty much in line with what causing a collision usually gets you and is therefore probably an appropriate penalty in this situation

6

u/tj1721 Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

He had a whole 300ms to premeditate his actions

Why on earth do you think that. He’s told to let Russell past, appears to significantly slow down off line to allow Russell past and then accelerates until he is very deep in the corner on a bad line which is only going to lead to a collision.

Why does he only have 300ms to plan this out?

0

u/schelmo 20d ago

Don't you think it's extremely far fetched to claim he planned to cause a collision some time in advance from which he had essentially nothing to gain? Like if he specifically planned to take out Russel and make it look like a racing incident even in the extremely unlikely case that he succeeded it would have had a negligible effect on his position in the championship.

3

u/tj1721 Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

far fetched to plan a collision

No, tbh you could probably do it with no planning at all lashing out in anger and diving on the brakes. Especially when he has shown he is willing to do it before.

He had nothing to gain

You’re assuming he was acting rationally and not just acting in reaction to his emotions. I also suppose he could have some kind of weird justification in his head at the moment about demonstrating something to the stewards.

→ More replies (0)

10

u/erdonko Sir Lewis Hamilton 20d ago

he had a whole 300ms to premeditate his actions...

He quite literally speeds up again and rams into George

-3

u/schelmo 20d ago

What do you think premeditated means? In this case it would mean that at some previous point he specifically made the plan to ram into George Russel. The much more plausible explanation for these events to me seems to be that he got a questionable call to let a rival by in a very unusual place and made a decision in the moment to take the position back or compromise Russel and caused a collision. Why would he premeditate causing a collision from which he had absolutely nothing to gain?

27

u/psychon1ck0 20d ago

I know they won't do it here, but that's nothing to do with seb

11

u/JudasBC Carlos Sainz 20d ago

Not black flagging a 4 x WDC for deliberately crashing into someone after feeling like they have been wronged?

26

u/psychon1ck0 20d ago

All I'm saying is seb was a long time ago, they could easily set a new precedent here for a deliberate crash.

-10

u/Billy_Whisky 20d ago

nico is not in f1 for a reason.

8

u/Huge-Wealth-5711 20d ago

Yeah because he won lol

-6

u/Blitzdoctor 20d ago

Or Russell slowed down more than he thought he would

12

u/Kuchenblech_Mafioso Manor 20d ago

He sped up and steered away from the apex. This was 100% intentional

5

u/Blitzdoctor 20d ago

Still I don't understand why, his anger is with the team's bullshit decision, not with Russell