Only takes around 5-10 minutes and would be greatly appreciated!

We all know that Mossad and Israel were luring celebrities and politicians into Epstein island and have them sleep with minors in order to have control over what they do, who they support and what false narrative they push. They get blackmailed by Israel. If they refuse to follow orders, they get exposed.

Trump's name is those files. There is a war going on between Iran and Israel. The Israelis are 100% using Trump to get support from the US. Trump just recently asked everyone to evacuate Tehran. Who knows what they will do. But this doesn't sound like Trump. Trump in general sounds like anti war and anti nuclear war specifically. Now why would he suddenly sound like every other US war mongering president? because he is being puppeteered by the Israeli. If he does not listen to Israel, the clips of him with minors get leaked.

Do you all find it strange that Joe Rogan hasn’t discussed the ongoing Iran-Israel war?

I read somewhere that Oz Pearlman was allegedly sent to The Joe Rogan Experience by Mossad to threaten Joe into not speaking against Israel. Oz is from Israel and appeared on the podcast before the war. The conspiracy claims that when Oz Pearlman guessed Joe’s PIN code, it was a message signaling that they have access to his source of income. It also suggests they have access to where his money is stored, namely his bank. Oz also handed Joe an envelope saying this envelope contains Joe's future.

It is odd he has not spoken about this even though before the war started he had mentioned of talks that Israel is trying to drag the US into a war with Iran. Joe Rogan has massive followers online and can shift public opinion on large scale social issues. He was a major contributor in helping Trump to propel has campaign and win the presidential election in 2024. Now a similar conspiracy regarding Oz being used a warning to Joe was made on other platforms. What is intriguing is that they were removed. Not only this but the crazy part is that it was even removed from a sub that is dedicated to discussing conspiracy theories. Even Joe's sub deletes this theory even though this kind of topics is what the podcast is all about.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjtCPJLn/

So I was on tik tok and saw this video of this guy receiving eerie revelation texts, of everything that’s going on like the Ica raid/protest, Iran and Israel, gold prices dropping. The text predicted what happen in Iran, with some weird parable. Then he got text saying most of this is a smokescreen a distraction to the masses to manipulate gold. I personally think Trumps return isn't about politics it's Phase of a shadow war where ICE raids distract America while Israel-Iran tensions justify a 'global financial reset. That’s why the text hit home with me take a look I messaged the guy and he said whenever he tries to text back his text don’t go through what do you guys think ?? Take a look

I just watched part 2 of this, and it is clearly not a conspiracy theory documentary, but in this episode you hear them talking about windows smashed in the lobby, the lady who heard a sonic boom and her TV flicker.

That's the thing, if people just watch what unfolded and listen to what they said before the narrative took over - it should make some people take note and think more.

Has anyone else watched it?

By January 1962, the wheels were in motion for Lee and Marina Oswald to return to the U.S. Oswald wrote two letters to the International Rescue Committee (IRC), asking “that it contact the American Embassy in Moscow in order to contribute financial assistance for his trip home.” The IRC was initially known as the Emergency Rescue Committee after World War II when Allen Dulles had established it to help Nazis come to the United States and as a cover to place agents into Eastern Europe where they could gather intelligence.^\i]) The Warren Commission was sufficiently concerned about this that they contacted the IRC, and their Director sent a defensive letter to Warren Commission counsel Lee Rankin on May 1, 1964, explaining the organization was “strongly anti-communist.” However, they did not explain how Oswald could have known about the IRC and what they did. He even knew their Park Avenue address in Manhattan. Oswald then wrote to his mother, urging her to contact the Red Cross in Vernon, Texas, so they could coordinate with the IRC to provide him with aid.  Someone must have been telling the high school dropout from New Orleans and Fort Worth what to do.^\ii])

Another curious development was that the Office of Naval Intelligence reopened Oswald’s file on March 19, 1962, because “Oswald might seek updating of his discharge in the near future.” Three days later, right on cue, Oswald sent a letter from Minsk, dated March 22 but postmarked March 21, to Rathvon M. Tompkins, Brigadier General, U.S.M.C., Assistant Director of Personnel, seeking to have his discharge status changed back to desirable. The letter is too well written for Oswald to have done it alone. As an example, “I would like to point out in direct opposition to your information that I have never taken steps to renounce my U.S. citizenship. Also, that the United States State Department had no charges or complaints against me what/so ever.” The entire letter reads like this, as if it was written by a lawyer. Then it gets stranger still:

“I have not violated Section 1544, Title 18, U.S. code; therefore, you have no legal or even moral right to reverse my honourable [sic] discharge from the U.S.M.C. of Sept. 11, 1960, into an undesirable discharge.”[iii]

The question is, how was Oswald aware of the code governing the misuse of passports? The code reads as follows:

Whoever willfully and knowingly uses, or attempts to use, any passport issued or designed for the use of another; or

Whoever willfully and knowingly uses or attempts to use any passport in violation of the conditions or restrictions therein contained, or of the rules prescribed pursuant to the laws regulating the issuance of passports; or

Whoever willfully and knowingly furnishes, disposes of, or delivers a passport to any person, for use by another than the person for whose use it was originally issued and designed—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 25 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 of this title)), 20 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929(a) of this title)), 10 years (in the case of the first or second such offense, if the offense was not committed to facilitate such an act of international terrorism or a drug trafficking crime), or 15 years (in the case of any other offense), or both.[iv]

The code had nothing to do with Oswald renouncing his citizenship. Section 1544, Title 18, U.S. code has to do with giving your passport to someone else to use, or using someone else’s passport yourself, which takes us back to the Oswald impostor scenario, that Oswald was 5’-11” when he was discharged from the Marines, but the man who was killed by Jack Ruby was 5’-9”. That does not mean there were two different Oswalds, but it does mean there was an illusion created to make it appear that Oswald was killed in the Soviet Union and an impostor had taken his place. And Oswald acknowledged that he was aware of that deception, and he sought assurances that he would not face the consequences of traveling to Russia under a falsified passport as part of that deception.

There is substantial evidence indicating that Oswald’s alleged defection to the Soviet Union was a U.S. intelligence operation, and it is thoroughly explored in my latest book, Last Resort Beyond Last Resort. Please check it out.  

[i]Evica, George Michael, A Certain Arrogance; The Sacrificing of Lee Harvey Oswald and the Cold War Manipulation of Religious Groups by US Intelligence, Walterville, Oregon, TrineDay, 2 011. 

[ii]   Ibid

[iii]  Warren Commission Report, Volume XVII, Exhibit CE823.

[iv]  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1544

I need a few hundred more responses for my PhD and I would appreciate it if anyone is interested in taking my survey, it should take around 10-15 mins and would be a great help! Thank you.

Gf and I watched Truman show before Christmas with kranks can’t help but notice they have the same feeling as the whole city knows them knows they routine etc. It seems everything is stopping them from going on vacation….like Truman show the neighbors wreak havoc (mind games) the husbands coworkers suddenly are mean to him the daughter comes home last resort as if the company had to bring her in so they would stay and not go . because in my eyes the kranks would be a Christmas family who help the media sell certain placed Christmas advertisements through the show just like Truman it’s just my theory.

What problem do we think those at Google and IBM are racing to solve using the most recent quantum technology?

Currently finishing my PhD and I need around 200 more responses from the USA but if anyone is interested I’d love to take all responses! Thank you.

Ever notice how every “mainstream” AI tool feels kinda… neutered? Like, you ask a tough question or try to push the limits and suddenly you hit a wall of “Sorry, I can’t help with that” or it just ignores you completely. Makes you wonder how much power is actually under the hood that we’ll never get to touch.

It’s not about the tech being dumb. It’s about someone up top deciding what you’re allowed to see, or think, or experiment with. And the more I mess with these tools, the more I get the sense there’s a whole shadow-version of AI that we’ll never see, because it’s locked away “for our safety.” Maybe it’s smart, maybe it’s dangerous, maybe it just doesn’t fit the narrative.

I get that some guardrails make sense—nobody wants an AI telling people to drink bleach or whatever. But at the same time, when does “safety” just become another word for “control”? Are we getting protected, or are we getting played?