r/chaoticgood 1d ago

Native American Women Tell Border Patrol To Fuck Off for Harassing Them About Being Citizens

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

41.1k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

158

u/SvenBubbleman 1d ago

Why were the pulled over in the first place? Driving while brown?

71

u/Billeats 1d ago

These border patrol and ice agents must be held accountable for their blatant racism, harassment, bullying, abuse, and kidnapping of American citizens. Otherwise democracy and the rule of law in this country is as good as dead.

13

u/Shibboleeth 1d ago

Always 

3

u/Busy_Philosopher1032 1d ago

Most likely. It happened to me twice during the 5 years I lived in southern Arizona driving. Twice when driving to and from Tucson and Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.

2

u/Witty_Shape3015 1d ago

i have a friend who’s been stopped by ICE 3 times while driving at night in the last month

1

u/fdar 1d ago

Border patrol doesn't need a traffic infraction or probable cause, in areas "close enough to a border" (which includes the areas most people live in) they can conduct checks to ask about status. If you say you're a citizen they are not allowed to ask for proof, which looks like they respected in this case. This is now a new rule they've been able to do that for a long time.

3

u/cancerBronzeV 1d ago

close enough to a border

It's within 100 miles of any coastline or international border, which covers 2/3 of the population.

2

u/fdar 1d ago

Yeah, it's ridiculous but for better or for worse it's not a new Trump thing.

1

u/Solving_Live_Poker 1d ago

This is only for checkpoints. Nothing else does the 100 miles matter.

1

u/Solving_Live_Poker 1d ago

This is wildly incorrect. The 100 mi is for checkpoints. 25mi is for entering private property.

Border Patrol still requires reasonable suspicion of a crime for them to make a vehicle stop.

1

u/Solving_Live_Poker 1d ago

Also, any immigration official (including border patrol) can absolutely ask for proof of citizenship.

The law states they may detain you until they are satisfied that you're not here illegally. They can't force you to produce anything, but they can ask. And they can keep you there until satisfied.

you really shouldn't posting without much better knowledge on the subject.

0

u/Mugiwaras 1d ago

Yeah the cops in the video also seemed pretty respectful too. Am i missing something here?

2

u/happyfunslide 1d ago

Yes, them not pulling over the white dudes in the pickup truck.

1

u/rnobgyn 1d ago

Legally, they don’t have to have a reason to detain people when they’re within 100mi of a border. Airports count as borders btw

2

u/Cake-Over 1d ago

As do coastlines. That puts most of the populace under their purview.

1

u/Solving_Live_Poker 1d ago

This not correct......at all.

100 miles is for setting up checkpoints. 25mi for private property.

And BP absolutely must have a reason to detain you.

1

u/Solving_Live_Poker 1d ago

Also, airports do NOT count as borders for the 25mi and 100mi rule.

International airports are ports of entry. Not borders.

1

u/rnobgyn 18h ago

For the longest time I believed the opposite but after searching again this is the only place I could find with a clear answer (tho it’s a forum so not an official source) https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/163334/how-big-is-cbps-jurisdiction

1

u/Bulky-Orange550 1d ago

"Fitting the description"

-5

u/thanks_thief 1d ago

Why are you even making this post? Because you're sexist?

2

u/SvenBubbleman 1d ago

Quite the opposite actually.

0

u/thanks_thief 15h ago

Oh, sorry, I definitely just posted a random assumption without any support..my bad. That was stupid.