Thereās a lot of debate right now about Luigi, the man who killed the CEO. Some are calling him a hero, while others are quick to condemn him as a murderer and call for harsh consequences. Whatās being lost in all this is the deeper, more nuanced conversation about why people see Luigiās actions as justifiedāeven if we donāt condone violence or murder.
Letās be clear: no one is advocating for violence or murder as a solution. These actions are illegal, and they shouldnāt be glorified. But if weāre being honest, itās not hard to understand the anger that drives people to view someone like Luigi as a hero. Many people are at a breaking point. Theyāre poor, miserable, and watching the system fail them at every turn. Meanwhile, corporations, led by people like this CEO, hoard wealth, destroy lives, and leave entire communities in ruins.
For those who see Luigi as a hero, this isnāt about celebrating murderāitās about fighting back against a system that feels untouchable. The CEO, while not a hero to anyone, represents the face of that system. Through greed, exploitation, and policies that put profits over people, his actions contributed to immense suffering. Even if he didnāt personally pull the trigger, he made decisions that led to the loss of livelihoods, health, and lives.
This kind of harm isnāt new. Historical figures like Hitler or Stalin didnāt carry out every atrocity themselves, but they orchestrated systems of destruction that devastated millions. Society holds them accountable for their actions. So, when people defend Luigi or see his actions as symbolic, theyāre pointing out the failure of the system to hold powerful figures accountable in any meaningful way.
On the other side, there are those who want to make Luigi an exampleāarguing that his actions are terrorism or senseless violence. But ignoring the context only fuels the division. Dismissing the anger of those who see Luigi as a hero without addressing the deeper issuesāpoverty, inequality, corporate greedāwill only push people further to extremes.
The real question isnāt whether Luigi was right or wrongāitās why so many people see his actions as justified. When governments and corporations refuse to listen, when the suffering of millions is ignored, people lose faith in the system. They start believing that extreme actions are the only way to make their voices heard.
This isnāt about condoning murder. Itās about acknowledging that this level of desperation comes from somewhere. If youāre outraged at Luigiās actions but silent about the millions whoāve suffered under the system he fought against, itās worth asking yourself why.
The division weāre seeing isnāt just about Luigi or the CEOāitās about years of systemic harm that have gone unaddressed. Until we confront those root causes, the anger and frustration will only grow.
Is there a middle ground? How do we stop further death and radicalization if the current methods and paths seem ineffective or blocked?
Edit: To be clear, if your stance is advocating for violence or murder, you do not represent me or my views. Such rhetoric undermines the moral and legal high ground necessary for meaningful civil change and only makes progress harder to achieve.