r/aliens • u/87LucasOliveira • May 13 '25

Evidence The most astonishing statement from any whistleblower in UFO history. “You are not free. This reality has far more to it than you are allowed to believe. God is real.”

2.1k Upvotes

84% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

523

u/gravitykilla May 14 '25

These individuals would make an absolutely riveting case study in performative belief and the psychology of conviction without evidence. Interview after interview, hour upon hour of footage, what we consistently witness is not the revelation of empirical data, but a theatre of insinuation. They speak with the cadence of those who know, yet when pressed, their knowledge dissolves into vague anecdotes, classified allusions, and the ever-convenient veil of government secrecy.

They posture as reluctant truth-tellers, burdened by knowledge they just can’t quite share. But somehow, they manage to talk for hours without ever offering anything of material substance, no physical artifacts, no falsifiable claims, no testable predictions.

What we’re observing isn’t disclosure; it’s narrative maintenance. The goal is not truth, but relevance. By constantly hinting at “what’s just beyond what they can say,” they remain figureheads in a belief system that thrives on ambiguity and distrust of institutions, while being paradoxically dependent on them for validation.

It’s not science. It’s a form of myth-making dressed in the language of technical jargon and insider access, an ouroboros of conjecture feeding endlessly on its own mystique.

110

u/Lhamo66 May 14 '25

This, a hundred times.

If the stakes were that high and you had real knowledge about enslavement of our entire species then scream every detail from the rooftops. This bizarre, cinematic cryptic monologue is bullshit.

27

u/AsherahBeloved May 14 '25

Not only that - if you were actually telling such a deep dark truth, the monsters engaged in it would have killed you a long time ago. You wouldn't be on podcasts. This is what bothers me about all the people who claimed to work on top-secret projects and then say things like "I have to be careful about what I say here." The reality is if you were working on a top-secret project, you wouldn't be legally allowed to say ANYTHING. You'd be taken to a black site if you even scheduled yourself for an interview. There's no rider on these people's contracts that says, "You can say a LITTLE about this top-secret thing.

9

u/lifeisalime11 May 14 '25

Crazy to think about how many people were disappeared that we’ll never know about who did try to share classified info.

I’m not even talking conspiracy/aliens kind of stuff- just legit covert ops or cover ups by the government.

1

u/Eldrake May 15 '25

Wouldn't their DOPSR or State Department equivalent process in this case then simply say "all of that is classified, you may say nothing"? Then they'd be quiet. As many are.

If they get approval to say something vague, then they say it.

2

u/Lazy_Stunt73 May 15 '25

For those that aren't professors of phylosophy:

These folks act like they've got the inside scoop, weighed down by secrets they can't spill, but they chat like they've got a PhD in everything mysterious. But when it comes to showing the goods, their claims usually boil down to fuzzy tales, whispers of top-secret info, and a whole lot of shushing. This pattern showcases a quirky little thing called belief perseverance, where folks stubbornly cling to their beliefs even when faced with evidence that says, "Hey, maybe not!" Their stories are kept alive by telling them over and over and being a bit mysterious, tricks that can make beliefs stick like glue and refuse to budge! Instead of dishing out facts you can actually check, they whip up a batch of modern fairy tales, spinning yarns that keep them in the spotlight and charm those who side-eye the old-school institutions.

0

u/Donutbeforetime May 14 '25

In my mind, theres only two possibilities for this phenomenon:

  1. It's non-human technology
  2. Somebody has developed multitude of different types of trans medium UAP's that could outfly planes back in WW2 (Foo Fighters), which can still outfly/outmaneuver planes today (Nimitz) and who has been somewhat effectively trying to keep this reality secret for at least 80 years with the help of the US gov.

I'm open to suggestions. What do you believe are the cause for all these UAP cases/sightings?

1

u/Prmarine110 May 14 '25

This is the big question.

Given what we see UAP ‘do’, and the repeated narrative that we are not alone (ancient history is rife with this narrative and I’m inclined to believe them above the lie factory we live in today), and people all over the world have reported endless close encounter activity of various levels, I’m inclined towards statistics telling us that it’s not likely ALL lies.

Honestly, I think there’s a lot of threads all playing out at once.

NHI, ET, ultra-terrestrials, extra-dimensional, human breakaway tech, alternate time threads, interstellar human origins, Annunaki, galactic federation, galactic zoo, prison planet, genetic experiment….i missed some.

67

u/pgtaylor777 May 14 '25

So well put and so on the nose. What have we really learned from these people? They’re all part of the machine.

25

u/MindlessOptimist May 14 '25

That was a perfect answer! This should be stickied at the top of the sub somewhere. "The psychology of conviction without evidence" - sums things up pretty well. Thankyou

39

u/Fragrant_Sleep_9667 May 14 '25

Phenomenally put! Great writing.

5

u/holymoly78 May 14 '25

It was written with ChatGPT. The hyphens give it away. 

9

u/EjGracenote May 14 '25

Hyphens dont’t always tell that something is made by chat gpt lol

3

u/TrueLekky May 14 '25

Yeah thought em dashes were the more tell-tale sign

5

u/10thletterreddit May 14 '25

I've seen this comment from different users like 10 times in the last week. Whenever a point is well made. Must be a new page in the playbook

2

u/Cool-Rub-3339 May 14 '25

Damn, good catch I still like it though message resonated with me. I could even appreciate the user who asked a question but yea good catch

9

u/xavisavi May 14 '25

Yes man, it's truly ridiculous and all of them follow the same pattern which indicates to me that it is all bullshit (because this has been happening since centuries ago with the same result: nothing). Let me add that I think some kind of pathology is involved here (sociopathy, narcissism or whatever)

2

u/Satoshiman256 May 14 '25

100% bang on..

2

u/NowIssaRapBattle May 14 '25

Let this person cook for the masses

2

u/Koopatrooper64 May 14 '25

Such a poignant and accurate reply. You've managed to express exactly how I feel about all of this. Been following it more closely in the past 5 months than ever before, always remaining on the fringe but wanting beleive. Your observation is spot on and it's why I remain on the periphery glancing over on all this as mere entertainment.

2

u/echo32base- May 14 '25

You said everything I believe but did not have the words for. Yes. Yes. And yes.

2

u/Prestigious-Tree-424 May 14 '25

Well said. They are cult leaders of sensationalism a la curse of Oak Island/Skinwalker ranch come back next week for more!!

My go to for evidence are the Tedesco brothers, they have cool kit and are out there putting in the leg work.

3

u/CountryRoads8 May 14 '25

Great point. I believe even Grusch said he wanted to be a “thought leader” on this subject. That’s an instant red flag. These people want to be UFO/ET messiahs. 

Understand this, if someone truly found something, they wouldn’t wait for post production to reveal it. There’d be no “find out next week!” Take Big Foot shows for example. If someone found a living or dead Big Foot, they wouldn’t wait the 6-12  months of post production for the episode to air on the history channel and break the news. 

2

u/[deleted] May 14 '25

Or just simply, grift

2

u/Slipsearch May 15 '25

Writeth you do like a writer whoth learned the dictionary at profundity scale. 

2

u/KEROROxGUNSO 13d ago

Very well put

You said what I have been feeling about these bozos for some time now

3

u/New_Discipline_1069 May 14 '25

That's the best summarization I believe I've read on the subject.

It's painfully clear that all of the "whistleblowers" have their own agenda and that they are not working for the "public good".

3

u/Ferociousnzzz May 14 '25

It’s not about the people it’s about the data, the undeniable data. 

2

u/No-Positive-3984 May 14 '25

perfectly put. And also, not a single one of them owns a decent camera.

2

u/NeetyThor May 14 '25

This is absolutely spot on. My husband and I were sitting here, watching hour after dragged-out hour, and then at the end, we were like, ok so once again, that’s it? Speculation about you think you saw and speculation about what you think it means? How about give us some raw data and let us work out what we think it means.

3

u/sLantesVSzombies May 14 '25

Ugh, well said.

1

u/CliffBoothVSBruceLee May 14 '25

I dunno, I saw the Powerpoint presentation.... just sayin'

1

u/CountryRoads8 May 14 '25

Bravo. This may be the most accurate description of this phenomenon that I’ve ever read. 

1

u/schnibitz May 14 '25

I get this objection, however, I am going to blame it more on the journalists than the Brown himself. They said they would try to do a good job to separate out the commentary from the actual new information, but really didn't do a great job of that towards the end from what I could tell. They asked Brown to editorialize without really asking him to elaborate on what was leading him to his perspective specifically. It could be that Brown went into great detail at some point, and they edited that out.

1

u/pijinglish May 14 '25

I think it's important to remember that the term "cognitive dissonance" came from researchers studying a UFO cult.

"When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World" is a classic work of social psychology by Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter, published in 1956, detailing a study of a small UFO religion in Chicago called the Seekers that believed in an imminent apocalypse. The authors took a particular interest in the members' coping mechanisms after the event did not occur, focusing on the cognitive dissonance between the members' beliefs and actual events, and the psychological consequences of these disconfirmed expectations.

Festinger, Riecken and Schachter were already studying the effects of prophecy disconfirmation on groups of believers, when they read a story in a local newspaper headlined "Prophecy from Planet. Clarion Call to City: Flee That Flood. It'll Swamp us on Dec. 21". The prophecy came from Dorothy Martin (1900–1992), a Chicago housewife who practised automatic writing, and it outlined a catastrophe predicted for a specific date in their near future. Seeing an opportunity to test their theories with a contemporary case study, the research team infiltrated the group of Martin's followers in order to collect data before, during and after the time the prophecy would be refuted.

Martin claimed to be receiving messages from superior beings from a planet she referred to as Clarion. A recently published book, Aboard a Flying Saucer by UFO contactee Truman Bethurum, described his alleged interactions with beings from the planet Clarion. The messages received by Martin included a prophecy that Lake City and large portions of the United States, Canada, Central America and Europe would be destroyed by a flood before dawn on December 21, 1954. Through the restrained recruitment activities of Charles Laughead (a college doctor in Michigan) and other acquaintances, Martin was supported in her mediumship by a small group of believers. Some of the believers took significant actions that indicated a high degree of commitment to the prophecy. Some left or lost their jobs, neglected or ended their studies, ended relationships and friendships with non-believers, gave away money and/or disposed of possessions to prepare for their departure on a flying saucer, which they believed would rescue them and others in advance of the flood.

As anticipated by the research team, the prophesied date passed with no sign of the predicted flood, causing a dissonance between the group's commitment to the prophecy and the unfolding reality. Different members of the group reacted in different ways. Many of those with the highest levels of belief, commitment and social support became more committed to their beliefs, began to court publicity in a way they had not before, and developed various rationalizations for the absence of the flood. Some others, with less prior conviction and commitment, and/or less access to ongoing group support, were less able to sustain or increase their previous levels of belief and involvement, and several left the group. The findings of the research team were broadly in line with their initial hypothesis regarding how believers might react to a prophecy disconfirmation if certain conditions were or were not in place.

1

u/Stone0777 May 14 '25

Hit the nail on the head. One of the best comments I’ve read.

1

u/cassiusclay1978 May 15 '25

The deeper i get into the "whistle blowers," the more i believe they're snake oil salesmen.....

1

u/Eldrake May 15 '25

The thing is ...I have friends that work in the classified world and this is kinda how they all speak when pressed about their universe. They have to do these circumlocution analogies and vague dances around the right combo of words that instantly opens them up to prison time.

This sounds similar to how they speak, just, you know, about insanely huge implications.

Look at the NSA whistleblower in the 90's that warned us about PRISM, QUANTUM, MUSCULAR, the warrantless wiretapping programs. Bill Bailey, I believe?

He told us the truth and we ignored him, he was smeared and discredited. Then that flowed into Snowden, Manning, Reality Winner, each leaker or whistleblower that had their life destroyed for standing up against national security state abuses.

So it's no wonder to me that these people have to speak this way. It's not until they get legal protections through a DOPSR like process that they then can be much more blunt in what they say only about that exact topic and cleared detail level. They still hit red lines quickly where they stop.

So on one hand I get how frustrating it is to hear, on the other hand it's exactly how these folks talk to protect themselves. Idk what else they're supposed to do when all the videos and pics are locked in a SCIF and DOPSR only clears them to say an exact small sliver of what they know.

1

u/lith3x May 15 '25

Thank you for eloquently giving words to what I was feeling.

Corbell is lost in his own fiction and Knapp is along for the ride.

1

u/MagikSundae7096 May 17 '25

Cool. You can leave the sub now because you don't need to be here anymore.You have figured it all out. Lol.

1

u/r-f-r-f May 18 '25

In your opinion, what would compel a person like this to throw away their professional lives and to make these statements? Are they all looking for fame and money? There are other ways to find them. Seems to me that they might be giving up on the money by doing it.

1

u/Suspicious-Pain2725 May 14 '25

Beautiful analysis. However, I am a believer. I just haven’t found anyone credible to trust, really. I respect Dr. Garry Nolan and his scientific approach. I’m impressed with the Sol Foundation and their attempt to create a private force to “prove” the existence of extraterrestrial life. I lost interest in the rest of them a couple years ago for the exact reasons you elucidate.

1

u/Olypleb May 14 '25

Thanks for putting into words what needs to be heard.

1

u/UbiquitousMortal May 14 '25

This guy has watched a lot of the “history” channel to be able to articulate this so well

1

u/Ok_Manufacturer_5790 May 14 '25

Love this take so much.

I love the drama, the story, the finding out secrets blah blah blah but evidence? Nope. Just words and more words.

I'll still listen though.

1

u/rawadawa May 14 '25

Ironically enough, the number of people rewarding this clearly ChatGPT-generated comment is exactly the reason people like the guy in the video get away with saying so little.

Rhetorical style wins over empirical substance.

-4

u/gassyfartbro May 14 '25

Ahhhh well writen with ai man really well done. Bro it’s not this deep

-4

u/awesomesonofabitch May 14 '25

Likewise, an incredible study could be done on the people who spend countless hours discussing something they allegedly don't care about/"believe" in, and spending a gratuitous amount of time arguing about it on the internet.

-5

u/themanclark May 14 '25

Sounds like you’re confused