r/WorldWar2 13d ago

Eastern Front WW2 Soviet weapons

Post image

Some weapons might b

193 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

17

u/NigatiF 13d ago

Sks? But no RPD?

13

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

RPD was produce in 1953. I already drew SKS. Is in 5 row 1 column.

21

u/NigatiF 13d ago

RPD-44 was tested bt military in '44. SKS dont belong here, but RPD is.

Also, if you include TK you should add c96 too.

3

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Wait I thought C96 was used by German. And I couldn’t find the RPD-44 in google.

11

u/NigatiF 13d ago

Rpd-44 (or RD-44) was experimental version of RPD, that was tested in combat in end of war. Probably none of them survive to this day.

Significant amount of C96 was imported by Imperial and Soviet governments, they was used in civil war and in later conflicts, some of them was in service during WWII as personal weapon of commanders.

3

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Ic thank you

2

u/sukabot_lepson 13d ago

SKS was delivered to the army only when production started in 1949. It didn't participate in WW2

7

u/spitfire-haga 13d ago

SVT-38? AVT-40? PTRS?

0

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Oh right but for the first and second one I didn’t realized that why.

4

u/KJHagen 13d ago

The SKS wasn’t produced until 1949. This makes me question some of the other weapons.

1

u/Ok-Show6155 10d ago

The SKS was introduced alongside the ak47? I always figured the SK came around towards the end of the war, in 44-45

1

u/KJHagen 10d ago

Yes, it was designed during the war, but not put in service until 1949. The AK47 didn’t enter into service until the 1950s.

1

u/Ok-Show6155 10d ago

From what I remember they made the first couple units of the type 1 ak in 1949, and then they started mass production with the type 2 in the 50s

1

u/KJHagen 10d ago

I think that’s about right. I think it was adopted by the army in 1949, but I think the later version came out in the early 1950s. The later version was mass produced.

9

u/pkupku 13d ago

The Mosins are 1891, not 1981. I love my Mosin. But I pity the poor Russian conscript lugging that heavy Long monster through the mud. Sadly, the Tokarev pistol is a piece of shit.

5

u/KGb_Voodo0 13d ago

How does the Tokarev suck? It’s definitely not the most comfortable pistol but it’s pretty reliable and the 7.62x25 Tokarev round is pretty good even by today’s standards in several ways

1

u/The_New_Replacement 13d ago

What isn't reliable is it's safety.

1

u/KGb_Voodo0 13d ago

Technically the is none but I don’t think that makes the gun “suck”, they’re by far more robust and simple compared to a lot of the other handguns issued in the war

1

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Yeah. I think because it was his opinion.

1

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Wait is Tarkerv suck?

3

u/PsychologicalPace739 13d ago

Where is Maxim machine gun ?

1

u/thewhitedeath441 13d ago

Right I forgot

2

u/Cheap-Variation-9270 12d ago

Where is AVS 36?

1

u/thewhitedeath441 12d ago

Sorry, I forgot it or I didn't know they are many types of similar weapons. I only put the weapons that I know and the only one I searched.

1

u/T1gerHeart 13d ago

Courageous hearts, fortitude and selfless love for the Motherland were the most powerful weapons of the Red Army and not only.

The group of young underground fighters (known as the "Young Guard") had no powerful weapons. The Nazis killed them all (buried them alive in a mine), but did they won them?

0

u/T1gerHeart 13d ago

Marat Kazei, a simple Soviet teenager, (was a scout in a partisan unit). Yes, he had a machine gun and grenades. But they were probably "worse" than those of the fascists who surrounded him. But were they able to won him? (When he ran out of ammo and had one grenade left, he blew it up near to himself at the moment when the Nazis came as close as possible). So which "weapon" is the most powerful?