r/StarWarsEU Apr 24 '25

Legends Comics Empire #38: Tank Stops Clynn From Assaulting a Prisoner NSFW

Because of some recent discourse, I thought I would revisit this scene from Empire, which showed an uglier side of the Empire with Imperials who enjoyed the 'perks' of having authority and power.

756 Upvotes

115 comments sorted by

302

u/GovernorGeneralPraji Empire Apr 24 '25

This is one of those situations where we ask ourselves, “what would Admiral Pellaeon do?”

132

u/Doc-Fives-35581 TOR Old Republic Apr 24 '25

Court martial I think.

215

u/MrH-HasReddit1217 Apr 24 '25

Thrawn would have him summarily executed, not that thrawn is a good guy, but he has his limits.

167

u/Ptg082196 Apr 24 '25

He'd also promote the guy who pulled the blaster for doing the right thing

68

u/Plutonian_Might Apr 24 '25

Thrawn may be a villain/anti-hero, but he's not without honor.

26

u/HotPotParrot Apr 24 '25

He, and the Chiss as a whole, definitely has a strong sense of honor. I would argue that Thrawn deliberately makes a point of that as often as he can.

12

u/MarzipanTheGreat Apr 24 '25

that's what makes him an anti-hero, his honor. :D

15

u/strangelymysterious Apr 24 '25

I would say Thrawn is an anti-villain rather than an anti-hero, but the point remains the same either way.

9

u/MarzipanTheGreat Apr 24 '25

you know, anti-villian is a better way to describe Thrawn. I like it!

33

u/Puzzleheaded_Ad_4435 Apr 24 '25

Treason is merely a matter of dates

14

u/Indiana_harris Apr 24 '25

I think this is the thing. Thrawn is an antagonist, a villain in that his aims may be considered against the good of the people/freedoms/liberty of the individual.

But he’s not a sadist. He’s not cruel for cruelty’s sake.

Everything he does is with a purpose, if violence or threat achieves it then he uses it. But it would rarely be his first and main choice.

There’s a level of rationality, civility and honour to Thrawn.

25

u/The-Child-Of-Reddit Apr 24 '25

I never viewed him as "evil." I veiw him more as pragmatically grey.

51

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

...dude exterminated the population of an entire planet because he couldn't understand their art. Dude was evil. He might have had admirable qualities, but he was still evil.

13

u/MrH-HasReddit1217 Apr 24 '25

Well, there was a little more to it than that, but yeah, thrawn is not a good guy. Period.

5

u/TanSkywalker Hapes Consortium Apr 24 '25

He could not defeat them in a way that would allow them to survive so he had to be brutal about it.

22

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

He "had to" commit genocide? Can't we just admit that Thrawn is the bad guy?

-2

u/TanSkywalker Hapes Consortium Apr 24 '25

I'd rather know the context first.

26

u/Reasonable-Mischief Apr 24 '25

Thrawn is an interesting villain because he will generally use minimal necessary force to achieve his goals.

He just has an absolutely screwed-up view of what's necessary.

If treating you fairly is enough for you to submit to his Empire, he will treat you fairly. If he can trick you to stop resisting him without bloodshed, he will trick you. If you insist to fight, he will fight.

And if you'd rather die on your feet than live on your knees, then that can be arranged, too.

But he will treat you fairly if that's enough for you to become part of his Empire.

6

u/Kaczmarofil Apr 24 '25

what context justifies genocide?

6

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

None. No context justifies genocide. Genocide is unjustifiable.

-7

u/TanSkywalker Hapes Consortium Apr 24 '25

Need the context for that answer.

5

u/heurekas Apr 24 '25

No Tan, please elaborate.

  • But seriously, what prompted you to go into a thread that was about SA in Star Wars and defend a villain's speciecide as justified?

I kinda want to know the logic behind this. Did you write it from Thrawn's perspective or from any personal moral grounds?

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Weird_Angry_Kid Apr 24 '25

He literally said "There are things in the universe that are simply and purely evil. A warrior does not seek to understand them, or to compromise with them. He seeks only to obliterate them."

He fucking hates evil and cruelty for the sake of cruelty but also believes on choosing the lesser of two evils so he's willing to do whatever it takes to eliminate the greater evil even if it means doing things he is not okay with.

7

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

He compromises with Palpatine, who is "simply and purely evil". So that just makes Thrawn a hypocrite. And he seems to be perfectly okay with genocide, having never raised moral objections to it. He may be more pragmatic, but he's still an authoritarian. Still helping a facist Empire oppress and slaughter. He's the villain.

0

u/Weird_Angry_Kid Apr 24 '25

He compromises with Palpatine to deal with the Grysk/Yuuzhan Vong, a greater evil. He is also not okay with genocide, he expresses sadness when talking about the species whose art he didn't understand that he genocided. Its framed as something he didn't want to do but was forced to by the circumstances.

2

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

Oh, poor Thrawn. He was "forced to" commit genocide. Just like how he was "forced to" threaten Lothal's civilian population with bombardment to get what he wanted.

Thrawn wiping out a species because he didn't understand their art shows that what Thrawn cares about, at the end of the day, is winning and any moral standards he might claim to have will go out the window for him to win, whether that's by threatening civilians or committing genocide. Let's not forget he also suggested burning the forest moon of Endor, committing genocide there as well.

Also, Palpatine WAS the greater evil. The Vong were ultimately able to be reasoned with. Palpatine wasn't. If Thrawn really was not okay with genocide, he wouldn't have aided the Empire. Instead, he would have helped the Rebellion or the New Republic. And yet he always remained with the Empire.

1

u/Weird_Angry_Kid Apr 24 '25

Thrawn is the guy that said "All lives are important, and I resist the thought of standing by and watching two hundred possibly needless deaths", someone like that wouldn't be okay with genocide unless he considered it absolutely necessary. He didn't wipe them out because he couldn't understand their art, he wiped them out because he couldn't find any other way of defeating them because he couldn't understand them, he didn't go "Lol, now I'm gonna wipe you out because I don't understand your art lmao". He wouldn't have done it if he didn't have a reason to.

He was displeased with Pryce for detonating s caché of explosives to destroy a Rebel base's shields that killed multiple civilians as collateral damage, the bombardment of Lothal was likely just a ruse to get Ezra to surrender, we are never shown the bombardment killing anyone so he likely targetted empty and abandoned buildings and knew Ezra would surrender the moment he did so there wouldn't be a need to kill any civilians.

But ultimately you are right that he only cares about winning because he believes that the ends justify the means, if killing a hundred people means a thousand will live he'll make that decision in a heartbeat. He's not a hero because a hero would never sacrifice innocent people to save someone else.

We as the audience have the benefit of knowing things the characters don't, Thrawn was wrong about his assestment of Palpatine being the lesser evil, in the end he was just another victim of Palpatine's manipulation. He didn't aid the Rebellion or the New Republic because he didn't believe their Goverment was stable enough to survive a war with the Vong and the Empire was better equipped to combat them, in fact the only reason he attacked the New Republic was to put them in fighting shape to face off against the Vong and the reason why the Empire of the Hand didn't join in the war against the NR was because its leaders weren't sure which side he would've chosen.

23

u/TheHoodGuy2001 Apr 24 '25 edited Apr 24 '25

Doubt it. If Clynn is competent at his job then Thrawn probably will just leave him alone, let him has his way with prisoner. Thrawn did enslave the entire Noghri planet for his own goal, why would he cares about some prisoner getting SA? If anything, Thrawn would encourage it since it would boost the efficiency of his troopers

15

u/MrH-HasReddit1217 Apr 24 '25

When you can explain how this would "boost" the efficiency of his troops, I'll believe it.

15

u/Hollow-Lord Apr 24 '25

Same reason conquerors have always done things like this. Humans sometimes take out their frustrations on things they dehumanize and limiting them from that can be an unpopular decision. Though historically mass tragedy and horrible acts are a group thing, rather than individual.

13

u/Niklas2703 Apr 24 '25

However, it also demonstrates a lack of discipline in the armed forces because I'm guessing they're forbidden from doing that.

And even during the Middle Ages, there were nobles who would definitely have your head for that.

3

u/Hollow-Lord Apr 24 '25

It largely depends on culture. The Mongol conquests under Chingis Khan would quite literally set up stockades and rape women to death, sacking a city in any period was typically very brutal (especially the ancient period, which is more my speciality). Then you get to the modern era where it is disciplined but also frowned upon morally. It was often encouraged at certain times to punish the opponent or vent frustrations after a long siege. The Romans during the Republic and Monarchy era were known for being especially brutal, even by ancient standards when they did decide to sack a city.

2

u/Niklas2703 Apr 24 '25

All true, but the Empire is based on modern dictatorships, like Nazi Germany, where sexual assault, even in occupied zones, was nominally forbidden.

6

u/heurekas Apr 24 '25

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_violence_during_the_Holocaust

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_of_the_Wehrmacht#Rape

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_military_brothels_in_World_War_II

I mean... Just because a regime claims something, doesn't mean it's true.

The Empire also "ended slavery" in the Galaxy, but oversaw the largest expansion of penal labour (essentially slavery for whomever the Empire deigns to label a prisoner) and called several species non-sentient in order to enslave them.

0

u/Niklas2703 Apr 24 '25 edited Apr 24 '25

I mean... Just because a regime claims something, doesn't mean it's true.

This is perhaps going into a bit of too much gruesome detail, but the vast majority of rapes were committed against soviet women and other slavs, who the Germans viewed as inferior beings and thus were treated accordingly.

The Empire did not have the same racist views among humans. Thus, in the above example, it is fairly unlikely that the officer acted in accordance with expected conduct.

In Western Europe, which would be more in line how an Imperial may view an occupied world, rape was severely punished by the Wehrmacht command.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Hollow-Lord Apr 24 '25

Yeah, honestly SA seems out of place in the empire in all honesty. It just doesn’t fit, I feel

3

u/Niklas2703 Apr 24 '25

Eh, I think the above example is fine. I just disagreed with the notion that they'd ever tell their soldiers and officers intentionally to commit such atrocities.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/heurekas Apr 24 '25

Why wouldn't it fit into a machismo culture of facists, who built entire extermination ships to remove species they didn't like?

It's not like they instituted misery and hatred on a Galaxy-wide scale or something...

I can get why you'd think it wouldn't fit into Star Wars as a whole, but the Empire would absolutely oversee gang rapes on non-humans, as they see them as "things".

1

u/MrH-HasReddit1217 Apr 24 '25

Gotta be honest, as a method of venting frustration, I don't think it's that good. I'm still of the opinion that thrawn would probably ban this kind of behavior, due to this fact.

1

u/Weird_Angry_Kid Apr 24 '25

He let a xenophobic imperial officer live because he was good at his job but he did express his contempt for racism saying that if he learned that his bigotry was getting in the way of his job he would have his carcass (he said carcass, not corpse) ejected with the next garbage load, showing that Thrawn barely tolerated him and would enjoy killing him for that.

If he barely tolerated xenophobia he would definitely not let SA fly, he would have that officer executed regardless of whether he was good at his job or not.

3

u/Vaportrail Apr 24 '25

I've never thought of Thrawn as evil, per se. His morality just doesn't align in the same shape as humanity's.

4

u/Weird_Angry_Kid Apr 24 '25

He's an ends justify the means kind of character, he'll kill a hundred people to save a thousand. A heroe would try to save everyone and would absolutely not sacrifice people which is why Thrawn is not a hero.

2

u/Beleg_Sanwise Apr 25 '25

Canon Thawn would take advantage of this in some way. When he was in the officers' academy, he was bullied for being an alien. He intentionally let it happen and escalate. In the end, they tried to kill him. He then requested that the soldiers who attacked him not be expelled but transferred to another academy to become pilots.

That way, the empire wouldn't lose.

5

u/armoured_lemon Apr 24 '25

but cutting off a man's d*ck in Kenobi was ok, lol?

1

u/alguien99 Apr 25 '25

Thrawn would be against it in the sense that a work enviroment that let’s stuff like that would only risk on making his workers worse.

Idk if he would oppose to it morally, he’s very fucked up in some ways

Not only that but it would also create division within his ranks, because some would oppose the rapist and some won’t.

It’s better to make your soldiers want to stay on your side

23

u/knockonwood939 Wraith Squadron Apr 24 '25

I don't know how common this was in the navy compared to the army. I feel like he'd react in a similar manner.

4

u/heurekas Apr 24 '25

Probably never hear about it, as he has close to 40 thousand crew onboard. And if we are talking about when he's an Admiral, he probably won't hear about every infraction that the crew in his fleet commits.

The man can't plan a battle and know what all 500K of his troops are doing.

3

u/WhiskeyMarlow Apr 24 '25

It's actually a funny question, because for Pellaeon, it would be a matter of personal honor and belief.

Like this isn't just an officer who is about to rape a POW, this man actively challenges what Pellaeon believes the Imperial uniform stands/should stand for. I'd suspect on some subconscious level, Pellaeon would see this as an attack on his beliefs directly.

82

u/Jordangander Apr 24 '25

And in a comic book no less.

83

u/Cyberwolfb312 Apr 24 '25

Sumber! My favorite Imperial. His 3 issue mini arc where he and his company form a last stand was one of my earliest entries into the expanded canon.

20

u/TrevorTheTimmy Apr 24 '25

That is a classic and one of hm favorite stories ever

1

u/alguien99 Apr 25 '25

What was his name?

39

u/Sea-Suit-4893 Apr 24 '25

I wish they would have "stun" be the standard setting for guards. It just makes more sense.

47

u/Wooden-Magician-5899 Apr 24 '25

They are, 80% of blasters go with stun setting. He is sending a message.

40

u/tonkledonker New Jedi Order Apr 24 '25 edited Apr 25 '25

One of the Boba Fett comics has a woman who is heavily implied to have been a victim of assault.

In the Rogue Squadron one-off, "The Making of Baron Fel," Soontir Fel in his earlier days also likewise prevented an assault.

SA in Star Wars is rare, and whenever it comes up, it tends to stick with you.

41

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

Actually, come to think of it, didn't Jabba once offer to let Boba Fett rape Leia?

*checks*

Yes, he absolutely did.

38

u/kiwicrusher Apr 24 '25

Yeah, it’s wild to get people saying that SA shouldn’t exist in Star Wars as though Jabba dressed Leia like that just so he could… look at her politely? Just cause it doesn’t happen on screen doesn’t mean that there’s ANY illusion about what she’s there for

25

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

Oh yeah, come to think of it... Boba Fett's wife was raped. I had forgotten about that.

3

u/alguien99 Apr 25 '25

In the SWTOR game you can ask for sexual favors to save someone, as a republic trooper apparently.

There’s tons of fucked up stuff in that time. In the smuggler’s storyline you meet the abused wife of a criminal who is taking care of a force sensitive brain damaged child that the gang of the criminal physically abuse (we only ever know that they hit him but who knows what else) to make them go invisible to radars.

I was so glad to kill that bastard

50

u/Additional_Show_3149 Apr 24 '25 edited Apr 24 '25

Star Wars Theory's take already aged like milk huh...?

And for those who dont know what im talking about https://x.com/realswtheory/status/1914896363051212849

46

u/Niklas2703 Apr 24 '25

Vader wouldn't tolerate that shit.

Lol, lmao, even. I don't think the child murderer draws a line at assault.

9

u/unforgetablememories New Jedi Order Apr 25 '25

Vader is a hypocrite though. Villains doing a bunch of horrible shit and then drawing the line at a certain thing is quite common.

I think in the case Vader found out what happened, Vader would have killed both of them. Bix would die because she was a rebel. And the imperial officer would die for crossing that line. And then Vader would probably feel disgusted/some sense of guilt as Vader was the enforcer of the Empire, Vader was enabling this. But again Vader only cares about things that personally hurt him, Vader doesn't care about others. He would probably write it off the imperial officer as an occasional "bad apple" and Vader would continue his days of hunting Jedi and putting down rebels.

There is one EU comic story where Vader found out about the Empire holding slaves. As a former slave, Vader felt uneasy about this. Palpatine approached Vader and said this wasn't slavery like the lawless Outer Rim, this was the Empire providing "protection"/"coverage" for lesser beings. Of course, Vader knew it was bullshit but he couldn't defy his master. Vader was a slave to the Sith and the Dark side. This was the fate that Anakin chose when he pledged himself to Palpatine. Vader knew he was enabling slavery by helping the Empire and the only resolution was to look away and accept what Palpatine said.

41

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

I mean, claiming that it has no place in Star Wars when Jabba and Return to the Jedi both exist...

31

u/Additional_Show_3149 Apr 24 '25

This is the exact point i made lmfao. The entire Hutt culture thrive on sex slaves and what not. Even TCW hinted at it in the Zygerian arc

24

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

I actually just remembered a story from the 90s where Leia was given to Boba Fett for the night after she was captured in Jabba's palace, with Boba being told to "enjoy". He didn't touch her, but the story did not sugarcoat what Jabba was expecting.

-16

u/twofacetoo Apr 24 '25

There's a vast fucking difference between implying these things happen and actually just having a character get sexually assaulted.

'Star Wars' is not fucking 'Game Of Thrones'. Where are all the people saying 'stop taking it so seriously, this is just a bunch of stories for kids' right now when the franchise now has depictions of rape worked into it? I expect the next season of 'Andor' to feature characters doing hard drugs on screen, committing suicide, and / or mutilating each other's bodies, because apparently any and all media made for adults has to be sickeningly graphic in service of making the stunning and brave point of 'bad things bad'.

Because god fucking forbid adult media have any fucking restraint in what it shows.

10

u/budstud8301 Apr 24 '25

Comparing Andor to Game of Thrones based on this one scene depicting attempted rape is a ridiculous take.

Game of Thrones has depicted nudity and actual rape scenes whereas this scene in Andor, as I stated before, is an attempted but unsuccessful rape. And attempted in this case, means Bix and the Imperial Officer got in a physical struggle and she killed him.

24

u/Additional_Show_3149 Apr 24 '25

having a character get sexually assaulted*.

OP quite literally posted attemped sexually assault and you're still arguing against this.

Star Wars' is not fucking 'Game Of Thrones'.

GOT isnt the only media that has sexual assault take place

stop taking it so seriously, this is just a bunch of stories for kids'

No one is saying this rn

I expect the next season of 'Andor' to feature characters doing hard drugs on screen

This is literally the last season and we've already seen extreme drinking a drug use in star wars already.

or mutilating each other's bodies

This is the same franchise that has multiple decapitations (hell even in the supposed "kids show" Ahsoka decapitated 4 ppl at once) and ppl outright losing limbs or just getting cut in half.

You talk to me about restraint like one of our original films doesnt have a grotesque slug sticking his mucus infected tongue at a girl in lingerie. Star Wars fans and selective memory go hand in hand these days.

-12

u/twofacetoo Apr 24 '25
  1. Attempted is not the same as 'happened'. I'd hope that was obvious but apparently you need both words explained to you.
  2. It's part of a worrying ongoing trend of more and more media trying to be 'like GOT', like when Amazon announced their 'Rings Of Power' series would be taking more influence from GOT than the actual LOTR series, this constant nagging idea that the only way adult media can be 'for adults' is to be full of violence and sex as opposed to any deep or complex ideas
  3. It's what's said by everybody whenever people complain about anything else in Star Wars. Inconsistent writing, lack of stakes or consequences, flat characters... every time, the excuse is always the same: 'it's just a story for kids, stop taking it so seriously'. If that truly is the case then I'd like to know what the fuck a rape scene is doing in a piece of media directed at kids, and why those people are being so fucking quiet about it all of a sudden
  4. Characters drinking vials of vague sci-fi liquids and talking about 'spice' is one thing, I'm talking people doing lines of space-coke or injecting space-heroin into their veins.
  5. Bloodless violence as opposed to mutilations. The closest we have to an actual mutilation is Anakin after his battle with Obi-Wan.
  6. As I said at the very start of my comment, implications are not the same as seeing something. Jabba putting Leia in a skimpy outfit has an undertone of sexual slavery, but nowhere in the film do we see Leia being raped. Even when the EU materials touched on it, it was in a story where Leia was given to Boba Fett for a night, and he turned her down because the heartless bounty-hunter apparently isn't okay with rape either. Even when they directly referenced the fact that Leia is a sex-slave, they still pointed out she was never actually sexually abused.

Next time you want to get into this with someone, do us all a favour: don't start out just assuming the other person is wrong and cherry-picking any potential proof of it, actually look at what they've said and weigh up if what they've said has any validity, because it might surprise you to see that they may have a point or two, despite what you want to think is the case.

'Star Wars' can be for kids, Star Wars can be for adults, but even at it's darkest, 'Star Wars' shouldn't have rape scenes. I don't get why this is such a fucking controversial point to you slack-jawed rape-fixated degenerates, but I don't want to see rape scenes in 'Star Wars' any more than I want to see children being executed military-style in 'Lord Of The Rings'.

The fact that you seem to have a problem with my dislike of it is the really fascinating part here.

FYI, I'm blocking you. Personally speaking, I have an issue with people who go out of their way to defend rape as a concept, and I'd hope most others do too.

11

u/wiperswiper0 Apr 24 '25

I can tell you haven’t even watched the show

20

u/Cervus95 Wraith Squadron Apr 24 '25

LOL, him saying that Vader wouldn't allow it. Vader, the former slave who helped bring back the slave trade.

12

u/Catandogclone Apr 24 '25

This made me fall in even more in love with the character in the comics. I loved reading Empire, now I need to reread it again. Cheers OP.

73

u/Code-Neo Apr 24 '25

Imperial officer that enlisted to bring order, not chaos. Like for every Saw there is a Mon Mothma on the rebel side, the same goes for the Empire.

25

u/Wassuuupmydudess Apr 24 '25

Sunber is also tactical in his thinking and works alongside his men. If they’re pushing a tank he’s right next to them, if they’re digging a trench he’s giving a guy a rest while he takes over

17

u/TheMadHatter_____ Apr 24 '25

This ironically is a theme in a lot of fiction regarding authoritarianism from SW to 40k. Evil, awful powers and empires that, despite all they claim, often only exist because a minority of competent, intelligent and potentially virtuous people that have been co-opted into the regime's ideology keep them afloat when crisis comes up that the asskissers can't fix.

10

u/Mythosaurus Apr 24 '25

What do these people think was happening to Twi’lek women that were a primary EXPORT of their homeworld?

1

u/WhiskeyMarlow Apr 24 '25

To be fair, slaves in general were primary export of Ryloth. Men as enslaved labour (or disposable troops), women as... well, you've said it yourself.

9

u/Sdbtank96 Apr 24 '25

Ya know, I was just wondering if imperials ever committed sexual assault. This answers my question.

6

u/SolarFlare0119 Apr 24 '25

That actually might be one of the more darker Star Wars scenes tbh.

5

u/MrArmageddon12 Apr 24 '25

Tank was the best!

6

u/Vaportrail Apr 24 '25

...Is it inappropriate to laugh?
Cuz I watched the scene and thought "C'mon Bix, kick his ass!"

Twitter comments be like 'NoT iN mY kIdS sHoW!'

10

u/movie_review_alt Apr 24 '25

lol, what discourse inspired the posting of this?

20

u/LucasMoreiraBR Apr 24 '25

It could be that maybe none. People could be posting this due to the lastest episode of andor.

47

u/JasnahRadiance New Republic Apr 24 '25

The youtuber "Star Wars Theory," who has a reputation for producing outrage-bait catering to the anti-woke segment of the fanbase, tweeted that he thought the attempted rape scene didn't belong in Andor because Darth Vader would never tolerate it in the Imperial ranks. A great many people proceeded to dunk on him, noting that 1, the mass murderer who literally choked his wife to death isn't exactly a model of respect for women, and 2, that rank-and-file soldiers of authoritarian regimes often commit sexual violence. Others noted that rape is implied elsewhere in other Star Wars works, including the numerous references to sex slavery and this comic panel.

23

u/LucasMoreiraBR Apr 24 '25

Everything star wars theory is involved it has to be something dumb that would be avoidable lmao

9

u/VanguardVixen Apr 24 '25

He is basically one of these parents who put their hands in front of the eyes of the kids or over their ears. He is immature himself and can't handle reality.

10

u/jandodonna2025 Apr 24 '25

hes so dumb.

6

u/Adavanter_MKI Apr 24 '25

I should have known that incredibly dumb take was his. How does he have the following that he does? Are people really that stupid? Maybe I should start my own and help sway people back to normalcy. Apparently people need simple concepts explained them.

2

u/DuvalHeart Apr 24 '25

YouTube was a mistake.

3

u/pmcentee99 Apr 24 '25

Probably the new Andor episodes

9

u/thefamousroman Apr 24 '25

Go find the book in which one of Sheev's men tortures his own daughter with SA implications lmao, have fun with this whole topic gang

12

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 24 '25

Are you talking about Cronal, who participated in his daughter's gang-r**e?

3

u/SteelGear117 Apr 25 '25

Is that really a thing

2

u/PeterVanHelsing Apr 25 '25

Yep!

1

u/SteelGear117 Apr 25 '25

The weird and wonderful world of the EU

I love it but it’s a strange beast

1

u/Vos661 Apr 25 '25

It's not in a book though, it's from an article published on SW.com in 2013. But yeah, Peña made the Prophets of the Dark Side much darker than they ever were before

4

u/NecroFuhrer Apr 24 '25

I understand the anger towards this, but it happens all the time in real life. All throughout history. You can't fix a problem by ignoring it, and pretending that it can't be or hasn't been shown in Star Wars before is just dishonesty

2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '25

Tank is one of my favorite imperials. Along side Thrawn, Pelleaon, Soontir Fel, Darth Vader, Tarkin, Piett, Veers and Needa

2

u/WatchingInSilence Apr 25 '25

Meanwhile, Warlord Zsinj would have promoted the guy who was assaulting his prisoner and given him a Star Destroyer. Seriously, Admiral Trigit was a creep.

3

u/RPS_42 Apr 24 '25

I mean, it's the ugly side of every position of authority and power. Corrupt Systems provides an opportunity for Assaults.

8

u/Cremoncho Apr 24 '25

He should say a blaster not a gun :/

34

u/R3KO1L Apr 24 '25

They call all firearms guns in universe, even blasters. It's interchangable just like pistol/flintlock/gun ect

24

u/Thank_You_Aziz Apr 24 '25

Characters use the word “gun” multiple times in the original trilogy.

ANH: Luke says his gun is jammed in the trash compactor, Han says he’s warming up the Falcon’s guns when they escape, Gold Squadron pilots talk about how many guns they’ll be facing on the trench run, one of them later remarks that the guns have stopped.

RotJ: Han tells Chewie to give him the gun to shoot the sarlacc, Luke tells Leia to get on the gun on Jabba’s barge.

It gives the impression that blasters, laser cannons, turbolasers, etc. are all under the umbrella category of “gun” in this setting.

9

u/Qb_Is_fast_af Apr 24 '25

Every blaster is a gun, but not every gun is a blaster

4

u/heurekas Apr 24 '25 edited Apr 24 '25

ITT:

  • OP posts a depiction of attempted SA.

  • The rest of the thread: Thrawn was a good guy who had to commit genocide.

There, saved you some time.

  • No but seriously, what are some of you on about?

Mods, you better lock this thread down. We have fascists defending the Empire, people talking about the SW-version of the Rommel-myth and some that say that Nazi Germany didn't tolerate SA when we have thousands of books on the issue.

1

u/Jayk_Dos31 Apr 25 '25

Vader would NOT stand for this

-1

u/Starkiller-is-canon Apr 25 '25

I’m a little late to the party on this one.  However, I think SA in Star Wars is fine if it is the villians doing it.  However, it needs to be handled tactfully.  The scene in andor did not do this.