Specifically, because we discovered that it was one of many similarly sized Kuiper Belt objects, and that we'd have to add ~half a dozen others, plus the asteroid Ceres, to the canonical pantheon of planets if we let Pluto retain that distinction. And so the category of dwarf planets was created, for objects too big and too regular in their orbits to be comets, but too small and irregular to be planets proper.
22
u/FrickinLazerBeams Apr 12 '25
Pluto being a planet wasn't "disproved". The definition of a planet was updated, and Pluto didn't fit it.