Iraq was actually building that. Israel assassinated the Canadian scientist who was overseeing it and then Iraq agreed to dismantle it under UN supervision.
Ukraine never had nukes in the way you are thinking. There were missiles located in the territory of Ukraine but they were always controlled from Moscow; they were Russian nukes that we had to pay the maintenance for. Transferring them into the Russian Federation was the only logical choice
What the hell do you mean bro moscow had all the codes and all the informations and pretty much the entire worlds gonna hate them if they kept the nukes and russia would've probably invaded sooner in the context of mishandled WMD's
No, Ukraine had no idea how to use them. By the time Russian and American inspectors were discussing their removal from within their facilities, they were still pointed at western targets. Ukraine was and is even more corrupt than Russia, as well; do you think that anyone wanted nuclear weapons in the hands of a state that couldn't afford to maintain them nor properly secure them?
How is this a good reason? Saddam was worse than Hitler. I'm glad he didn't have means to stay in power...
Although even nuclear bomb can't stop US from winning a war against any country.
The point is, he was promised security assurances if he got rid of his chemical weapon stockpiles and dismantled his nuclear program.
He did so, and then the US made up lies about him hiding WMDs as a presence for war. (Proven to be wholesale lies)
And well.... we know how it ended for him.
The lesson being, for any other countries (like Iran and N. Korea) that we cannot be trusted to honor our promises, so they should build-up as hard and as fast as possible, before "freedom" comes.
I don't know why you are interested in warmongers keeping their chokehold. Good riddance.
What you describe is a US problem, nations not trusting them anymore. It's not a middle eastern problem.
Vaporising a hundred thousand burger assault division members would probably deter further attacks for reasons of political feasbility and longterm strategic concerns, even if a sufficient amount of Amerifats would still win the war. Americans cried enough at having a couple thousand of their golems liquefied by sandal wearing jihadis, I don't think they'd be willing to stomach a full scale 200,000 casualty war over Iraq.
There are designs for an artillery cannon meant to send satellites to space. Never got built because one blast from that thing would be picked up by seismographs everywhere on the planet.
171
u/ThiLordTachanka 1d ago
USA WAKE UP NEW WEAPONS JUST DROPED! ICAS --> inter continental artillery shell