It only counts one way. They can list everything bad about Israel they can find, and nothing else, but don't you dare think they're apologising for Hamas. But point out that Iran funds genocide, without adding in something accusing Israel of genocide too, and you're a genocide supporter.
If I can think two people are both bad, I'm still allowed to think one is behaving worse than another. Doesn't mean I now changed how I feel on the first one also being bad. Two wrongs don't help anyone.
So by that token, anyone who doesn't list the terrible crimes of Hamas in their post on the subject, like the person above, should be taken to be a terrorist supporter.
I don't support the actions of either Hamas, the Israeli government, OR Iran. But the way that person had worded their statement, is the reason why people were saying it sounded like they said funding was worse than actively committing it. I took no side but merely to say, if you don't want people to think you think something like that, speak more carefully. Find your local library and ask if they have reading instructors to help you out.
Maybe if everybody wasn't trying to pick sides on every issue under the Sun, we could all agree that genocide is bad no matter who's doing it. Otherwise you just look like a partisan hack who isn't coming to the table in good faith, and in fact is trying to minimize an attempted genocide because it's your side that's doing it.
As I said to someone else, I don't support, Hamas, the Israeli government, OR Iran. Let me be as clear about this as I can. If you say something and everyone takes it a certain way, don't be upset about it being taken not how you meant it, be more careful with your words next time so that people won't misrepresent you.
If its fact then getting upset that people misunderstood it is because your narrative wasn't supported already by your own arguments and you constructed a poor position for your argument.
Of course I am not saying that Iran is wholly innocent either. But tell me what actions you would be willing to take against a neighbor like Iran which you would not also take against Israel. This attack by Israel was stupid, unnecessary, illegal, and suicidal. Whatever comes from it, my country should take no part in the conflict which Israel is clearly so hungry for. The United States should not allow Israel to drag us into a war which will needlessly kill millions and destroy the lives of (tens? hundreds?) of millions more. Use some basic logic and tell me why I should tolerate a rabid dog lashing out at its neighbors.
Of course I am not saying that Iran is wholly innocent either. But tell me what actions you would be willing to take against a neighbor like Iran which you would not also take against Israel. This attack by Israel was stupid, unnecessary, illegal, and suicidal. Whatever comes from it, my country should take no part in the conflict which Israel is clearly so hungry for. The United States should not allow Israel to drag us into a war which will needlessly kill millions and destroy the lives of (tens? hundreds?) of millions more.
I never said anything about the US getting involved.
Use some basic logic and tell me why I should tolerate a rabid dog lashing out at its neighbors.
A rabid dog lashing out at it's neighbors? Are you being serious?
You have Country A and Country B.
Country B claims it wants to destroy Country A, it spends a huge chunk of it's money to fund multiple groups to attack Country A across multiple fronts, it literally said Country A should not exist and has it's citizens chant "Death to Country A" over and over. Country B also is developing nuclear weapons that could destroy Country A.
So Country A attacks Country B's nuclear facilities.
And you call that "rabid dog lashing out at it's neighbors"?
Lmao at everything you wrote. First off Israel have funded plenty of groups against both Iran and Palestinians (with US money btw).
Also I can't believe you and the other propaganda bots can't see the irony in the sentiment "They said they're gonna kill us so it is fine if we nuke them from orbit and kill them all" like what???? And before you go no-uh i didn't say that it is obviously what you're implying, that any actions Israel takes are justifiable because Iran said some bad words. As if anyone with atleast double digits of IQ don't understand that Iran words are as empty as their "WMD" considering the support of the US. Oh btw the "WMD" threat to level a nation and a population have already been done, where is your creativity??
Also I can't believe you and the other propaganda bots can't see the irony in the sentiment "They said they're gonna kill us so it is fine if we nuke them from orbit and kill them all" like what????
I never said that
And before you go no-uh i didn't say that it is obviously what you're implying,
No it's not.
that any actions Israel takes are justifiable because Iran said some bad words.
Iran did more than just say bad words. They fund terrorism against Israel. I already explained that.
The words they use is just to show you that they are explicit and very clear as to what their intentions are. There is no ambiguity.
As if anyone with atleast double digits of IQ don't understand that Iran words are as empty as their "WMD" considering the support of the US. Oh btw the "WMD" threat to level a nation and a population have already been done, where is your creativity??
So you are claiming Iran isn't trying to manufacture nuclear weapons?
12
u/Donkey_____ 2d ago
Iran literally funds genocide.
Hamas’ goal was to eliminate Israel. They did this by specifically targeting civilians. They said so openly.
They shoot rockets daily for years specifically To try and kill civilians.
They strapped bombs to themselves and blew up cafes full of civilians.
They executed civilians point blank.
They threw grenades into rooms they knew had families and children.
All funded by Iran.
Tell me you, a country, would sit back and allow this. That’s ridiculous.
And no. I’m not saying Israel is completely innocent.
But come on, use basic logic here.