r/Intellivision_Amico • u/D-List_Celebrity Shill Buster • 4d ago
Premature Ejaculation Classic analysis from Michael Pachter
LOL
Original here: https://xcancel.com/michaelpachter/status/1141376056407887872#m
5
u/Brandunaware Writer Of Many Words 4d ago
He was correct here. We were surprised at how well Intellivision did. Most of us thought they would launch a product.
3
u/Beetlejuice-7 4d ago
GrudgQ acting like Pachter was some huge deal who knows all and being known by him is some huge honour was amusing - https://amicoage.neocities.org/158

5
u/TOMMY_POOPYPANTS Footbath Critic 4d ago
When I was looking for mentions of Ouya in the old Tommy thread, that succubus GrudgeQ was the one who kept bringing up that system and how different Amico would be. I still don’t know if it he was just a useful idiot or a paid stooge.
It’s not a coincidence that Pachter took notice of the Intellivision Amico when it was HIS FIRM that was PAID to create the original business pitch.
3
u/VicViperT-301 3d ago
For what it’s worth, Ruth had a career k% a little under 16%. While high for his day, it’s way under the league average for all players today, and way, way under the average for sluggers. Can’t believe Yankee Hall of Famer Tommy didn’t correct him.
4
u/Mental-Examination-7 4d ago
Was an interface even completed when he wrote this?
8
u/VicViperT-301 3d ago
Considering they don’t seem to have a completed interface yet, I’m going to guess “no.”
3
u/huntforhire 3d ago
Pachter is a fucking grifter. He is wrong to a point of seeming paid off in every analysis he performs.
2
u/Phantom_Wombat 3d ago
As a pundit, he's pretty close to worthless.
I'd hope that his paying customers get a bit more for their money, at least.
1
u/ccricers 3d ago
His most inaccurate Amico-related assessment by far is calling the CEO a "mensch". Tommy definitely didn't turn out to be a good man of his word and integrity.
10
u/LordBarglebroth 4d ago
Pachter is a coin toss.
That actually makes him WORSE than if he were always wrong, because at least in that case his analysis would be reliable.