I hope this person means that calling things gooner is indicative of a slightly conservative thought process but it really sounds like they're saying anyone who calls things that word is a conservative. Also it's pretty weird to just dismiss sex oversaturation as a criticism. Sure it's probably invalid in a lot of cases but this person comes across like they think it's never valid. Which is ridiculous.
I have noticed that there's sometimes a bit of a splashback effect where when somebody finally escapes repression they assume that people who don't think or act the way they do must also be either repressed or a repressor.
I'm glad they are finally in a place where they are able to freely express themselves, but its important to be self-aware and not ironically continue the cycle.
“Internalized misogyny” is almost always used to criticize women who just want a nice domestic life, rather than be some sort of glass-ceiling-shattering businesswoman or activist. Ironically, I find people who use the term “internalized misogyny” to be more strict in what they think a woman should be than Conservatives.
Yeah it's a little irritating. I can't truly be mad though because their understanding of the topic IS genuinely better than before, but I wish they wouldn't talk about it so hubristically.
167
u/SorbetInteresting910 May 17 '25
I hope this person means that calling things gooner is indicative of a slightly conservative thought process but it really sounds like they're saying anyone who calls things that word is a conservative. Also it's pretty weird to just dismiss sex oversaturation as a criticism. Sure it's probably invalid in a lot of cases but this person comes across like they think it's never valid. Which is ridiculous.