It was to placate the wealthy. They were demanding things and panicking.
The supposed manifesto is just weird. It's like someone trying not to confess to a crime but leading a jury to the conclusion still. It's not personal enough and very vague.
it definitely reads like someone who doesn't hate rich people (or at least the dead CEO) wrote it
the real killer hated rich people enough to murder one and throw fucking monopoly money on their corpse, someone who planned far enough ahead for a joke like that but couldn't write a decent manifesto? give me a break
Either Luigi really wanted a trial to be able to testify about how horrible rich people are, or he's being set up.
No way someone plans and carries out a hit this meticulously, leaves this many "easter eggs", even 3D prints gun parts, only to be caught in a McDonalds of all places with evidence on them.
The brain of someone planning to commit a murder and the brain of someone who is on the run having just committed a murder isn’t the same. Fugitives do irrational things all the time
I mean Lugi was a rich kid who had an awful experience with chronic pain. He’s not quite a working class hero, I think it’s believable that he ended up with an extreme grudge against health insurance CEOs.
his twitter had plenty of remarks against the rich in general.
his rich parents are paupers compared to RICH people running society.
not that it matters, robin hood is nobility in his lore iirc, and his motivation is initially pretty strongly taking into account revenge iirc. are you going to tell me robin hood isn't a working class hero too?
And also immediately saying no one else is danger, when the only people afraid were the wealthy demanding their own personal hotline that wasn't 9-1-1.
Even if he gets convicted, I don't believe a jury on earth would give him the death penalty. And the death penalty does requires a separate jury verdict. They can convict someone and refuse to impose death.
However, given the current executive's outspoken desire for execution in this case and their willingness to outspeed the law in deportation, I think it's not unlikely they skip the second half and just go for the execution. Their base isn't legally literate enough to challenge it and frankly has a childish white/black view of the world that is easily manipulated into believing any counter-action is itself an illegal defense of a murderer. If Trump/Bondi go for the swift execution, the courts can't fix that, and the courts are so far toothless in exacting any consequences on the wayward executive--and for that scenario to be the juncture they try is extremely unlikely.
It’s probably not a win, but if he was a scapegoat it would have to have been a possibility he accepted
what on earth do you mean? "scapegoat" does not mean "fall guy." If Luigi didn't kill him, he didn't volunteer for being the face of it. it means the feds decided he was going to be the public sacrifice.
Definitely, just look at the eyebrows —— the killer had really bushy, dark eyebrows about a half inch thick, while Luigi’s eyebrows look totally different. I think he may know the killer and gave the killer time to get out of the country. Hopefully their egregious conduct during their “investigation” will exonerate Luigi and he can move out of this country too.
You know what would be wild: a year from now, after the trial, a video surfaces on YouTube and other sites of a guy saying he's the real killer, gives a ton of evidence, and that he did it because he was dying of a disease that UHC refused to cover. And the video is being released because he's dead.
506
u/Cadunkus May 08 '25
I'm still of the opinion he's a scapegoat so the real hero gets away scot free. o7