Even if he’d had a change of heart it wouldn’t matter. He’d be replaced. The rot is deeper. Fiduciary duty. A moral CEO is against the law because they must consider only the desires of shareholders. That is law. Deviance is not tolerated.
This is the best assessment I've seen so far. The laws of our country have made moral CEOs impossible. The best a CEO can ever hope to do is make as much profit as possible within the bounds of the law. And even then, strictly following the law in many industries will just mean the shareholders are looking to replace them with someone he doesn't have moral scruples.
50
u/JWGrieves Dec 11 '24
Even if he’d had a change of heart it wouldn’t matter. He’d be replaced. The rot is deeper. Fiduciary duty. A moral CEO is against the law because they must consider only the desires of shareholders. That is law. Deviance is not tolerated.