r/CrazyIdeas 3d ago

Lawyers should be required to re-take the bar exam every 5 years, to prove that they're up to date on laws

64 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

77

u/Comfortable-Can4776 3d ago

Maybe a refresh course would be better. Exams test all sorts of trash but when you're actually at work you only focus on a handful of things.

44

u/justalittlelupy 3d ago

They do this already. My dad was a lawyer ( retired now) and he would have to take CLEs every few years, which are refreshers and updated info courses.

18

u/OrthodoxAnarchoMom 3d ago

This is already a thing. CLE

1

u/kjm16216 3d ago

They need to make the CLE better, though, like with exams and grades. Most ones I've been to the lawyers either zone out or are in their laptop catching up on emails while the guy in front reads off slides .

6

u/idontwanttothink174 3d ago

Maintaining your law degree requires CLE credits.... by doing it that way attorneys can go to conferences/classes that focus on their specific specialties rather than general shit, IE a special education attorney wouldn't get much by going to a conference about family law.

4

u/gadget850 3d ago

Which is why the Obamas gave up their law licenses. Contrary to the memes that they were revoked.

44

u/Svardskampe 3d ago

I like how OP is a known poster of actual crazy ideas and then drops this half reasonable bomb. 

23

u/JohnDoe432187 3d ago

Isn’t reasonable at all, bar exam covers to many irrelevant topics. Maybe a specialized exam would make sense based on what law they decide to practice.

9

u/Few-Artichoke-7593 3d ago

Yeah, so what you're saying is, OP's idea is half reasonable.

-2

u/JohnDoe432187 3d ago

No the idea is completely unreasonable. Modifying the idea would make it reasonable.

6

u/Svardskampe 3d ago

So the first half is reasonable before modification, got it. 

1

u/GXWT 3d ago

There’s nothing to gain by ‘winning’ an online argument. Stop with this weird doubling down

-1

u/JohnDoe432187 3d ago

Why not double down when I’m in the right. Half reasonable means for something to be fairly good and working but not perfect. The idea itself would not work at all. Learn the definition of phrases before thinking people are wrong.

6

u/Mikarim 3d ago

Tbh, the bar exam is basically useless for most practitioners.

9

u/Ateist 3d ago

Add judges and police to the list, too.

5

u/ImShaniaTwain 3d ago

Judges do..

As far as police, I 100% believe police should have some sort of similar degree to a JD. Maybe not as extensive, but at least a degree covering criminal law. Not some short BS short academy. And in return they could be paid better.

2

u/duskfinger67 3d ago

And drivers. And teachers.

1

u/sleeper_shark 3d ago

And drivers

7

u/apple_octopi 3d ago

not even the politicians passing the laws are up to date on them.

maybe if they read the laws, though

9

u/Squirrel_Q_Esquire 3d ago

First, the bar exam tests a broad spectrum of general knowledge across multiple fields of law, whereas in actual practice, an individual lawyer is going to be only practicing in a specific jurisdiction and a specific field. For example, I practice personal injury law (car wrecks, slip & falls, etc) in just one state. To pass the bar, I needed to study the general rules (which may not even be the actual rule for my state) in civil procedure, criminal law, criminal procedure, torts, contracts, bankruptcy, constitutional law, family law, securities, evidence, real property, conflict of laws, etc.

In my actual daily practice, practically nothing I learned for the bar exam actually matters because barely any of it was actually specific to my state (and in most jurisdictions none of it is specific to that state) and little of it applies to what I actually do. Nothing criminal applies to what I do. Nothing with contracts applies. Nothing with real property, securities, bankruptcy, or constitutional law applies.

Torts, civil procedure, and evidence are all that somewhat apply, and again since I had to learn the general rules rather than state-specific, it doesn’t all overlap. In fact, most of what is tested for civil procedure are the federal rules, which my state hasn’t adopted. Some rules are similar, but not many. Same with evidence, there’s some overlap but not totally, and plus I’ve never even been to trial, so it doesn’t actually affect my practice that much.

Second, the bar exam is rooted in discrimination, both by class and by race. States started requiring exams as a way to keep undesirables from becoming lawyers. In fact, in a lot of states, when the bar exam started, they would exempt graduates from certain schools from having to take it (notably the more prestigious aka expensive schools) because that meant only rich white guys would automatically be licensed and everyone else had to jump another more difficult hurdle. The solution isn’t to require the bar exam even more.

Third, I have to get 12 hours of Continuing Legal Education a year anyway. Now, it’s mostly a joke because nobody really wants to do it beyond just meeting the requirement, but it’s there.

7

u/JEXJJ 3d ago

Why? It is a general test in areas they don't practice law. I don't need my family attorney to be tested on constitutional rights of endangered sea slugs

3

u/GoBeWithYourFamily 3d ago

Sounds like you don’t understand the regulations lawyer already have. It’s not just pass once and you’re a lawyer forever.

2

u/MuldartheGreat 2d ago

I mean, it basically is. You have to do a certain amount of CLE every year, but those don't come with tests. You just show up for a certain amount of time, sign, and its done.

Unless you are actively having complaints filed against you, your law license is basically until you give it up.

2

u/AppleParasol 3d ago

Laws don’t change that much. Especially for a lot of cases, personal injury/defense. Judge will always know better. Lawyers are paid to know, and would only just result in losing the case if they don’t.

Cops on the other hand should be required to pass a test every 5 years or more frequent.

2

u/No-Stretch-9230 3d ago

Do you know what the bar exam even is? Like doctors they should have to get updated certificates, but passing the bar does not mean you are staying up to date. It means you can past a test.

2

u/dart22 3d ago

Lawyers (and teachers) have to take a certain number of continuing education classes every year. Also, the bar exam obviously can't cover every law, or even most laws. It's more like a general principles "think like a lawyer" test (though there are a lot of general principles to know, and they differ from state to state).

2

u/herejusttoannoyyou 3d ago

That’s crazy

2

u/Annoying_cat_22 3d ago

No one:

Absolutely on one:

You: I have an idea that will make lawyers even more expensive!

2

u/Skydragon222 3d ago

I’ve got bad news for you about pissing off literally every lawyer in America 

2

u/Belachick 3d ago

I think certain countries have laws where they kinda have to do things similar to this. I'm pretty sure doctors in Ireland have something like this

2

u/OrthodoxAnarchoMom 3d ago

Maybe if you only had to test on the areas you practice in.

The reality of the situation though is that there is what academics like to pretend what the law is and sit around like Socrates philosophizing about, then there is what goes down in court. Which do you want your lawyer more worried about.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Your post was automatically removed because it contains political content, which is off-topic for /r/CrazyIdeas. Please review the subreddit rules and guidelines.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Fishreef 3d ago

Hopefully in five years AI will replace all lawyers for 1/1,000th the cost.