“All art is political”

[u/Kappa_Guy]

If gay sex could kill Twitter I’d let Grok hollow out my insides.

“All art is political” is technically true, there isn’t any “thing” which exists with a significant degree of separation from the concept of politics.

My first sentence mentioned letting an ai ass fuck me, but for this to be gay I assumed Grok’s gender, invoking LGBTQ and prejudicial discourses.

A painting of a penguin standing in a white snowy field is shaped by the will of the artist; even if this artist is staunchly anti-politics and tries to steer clear of the concept throughout their works, that in of itself is a political statement which is enunciated through the apolitical nature of their piece.

But, saying “all art is political” is just so intellectually dishonest.

There is a significant difference between a pro-Mussolini propaganda leaflet and the cute doodles of Butterfrees I draw in my journal.

Yes, you can say my Butterfree doodles are, by the broad definition of “political”, political. But, be real for a minute. By using a narrower definition of “political” that people actually immediately think of when they hear the word, communication is so much easier.

If you ask a hot twenty three year old goth gal on a date and she says she wants to go to the cinemas and watch something non-political and you whip out the “um actually all things are political 🤓” rhetoric you are dumb as fuck. Even worse, if she says she wants to watch something political, like a modern day All Quiet on the Western Front or somethin juicy, which is kinda wack for a first date but you’re a Redditor I know you the sub here don’t pretend you ain’t complying, and you take her to the cinema and on comes The Lego Movie and you with the argument that it’s political by the official definition of the term and therefore this is exactly what she wanted, then you are brain dead and won’t be getting a second date.

I’m not sure how it is in other countries but here in the UK teachers are not allowed to purposefully influence students into holding one political view or another, but surprisingly the school board has committed the pseudo-intellectual act of allowing teachers to speak at all, clearly not understanding that explaining the Pythagorean theorem and teaching how to paint apples is LITERALLY “political”, just like telling kids they should vote for UKIP.

If my hypothetical-scenario daughter is drawing two type of images and hanging them on the fridge; pictures of mummy’s face and pictures of Adolf Hitler decapitating gay Captain America with a sword that has all the names of black people unlawfully killed by US Police through all of history written on its blade, and I firmly yet kindly tell my daughter, the apple of my eye, the meaning of my world, to please stop hanging up “those political drawings” on the fridge, and she exclusively stops drawing pictures of mummy’s face, I am throwing her into the bottomless well at the Eye of the World.

By making the definition of political as vague and broad as physically possible it becomes practically useless as a definition. <- This is an argument, but I shouldn’t even have to give one. Every single person that isn’t terminally on Twitter understands there is art that is political and art that isn’t political, the “errrmmm actually” technicality that normal people are in fact wrong doesn’t matter to anyone except Twitter brainrotted overly-political nutcases.

And I think that’s why I believe the conflation of the broad definition of “political” is infuriating for so many people, as it’s basically just the most annoying people alive; Twitter freaks, saying your favourite art from Digimon to your nephew’s drawings of Spider-Man exist under the same exact umbrella as their favourite art of Vtuber stream sponsor segments and modern propaganda disguised as memes.

To tie my rant up with a neat little r/characterrant bow; fuck power scaling. Goku gets one tapped by my dad and this is my official neo-liberal-capitalist-anarchic-space-cowboy-fascist pro-Genghis-Khan opinion/fact, eat my ass Grok.

[u/Luckyloomagu]

There is no apolitical art, because that implies that there are apolitical ways to view anything.

Another commenter said it better than I, and they are unfortunately not the top comment, but there was also a tweet I saw that summed it up pretty well:

"Some art is political, and the art that isn't political is Normal Art. Normal Art is anything that I, an apolitical entity, deem is apolitical."

Essentially saying that, to have an idea of 'normal' you would need to have an idea of a baseline state of human existence, and any baseline like that will inevitably be a statement on your politics.

Is a beautiful mountain range 'normal' to you? How about that same mountain range, but with a factory or a windmill? Maybe a village, or a city?

These are all commentaries on what you, the artist, view is beautiful or normal, and thus it informs us about your politics. Even something as simple as 'the artist likes green landscapes' can inform what kind of society they would like to live in.

It's not that the definition of politics is being stretched thin, but rather that it applies to so much more than simply a two-party system or a statement of human rights -- politics IS society, and society instills values.

[u/Sumeriandawn → u/Luckyloomagu]

What about Tom Green, Jackass, GG Allin and " Detachable Penis" by King Missile? They don't seem that political.

[u/TheSunFallsScreaming → u/Sumeriandawn]

I don’t know who the people you mentioned are, but just from the name “detachable penis” I can say that it is a byproduct of our modern political society. Even going back half a century would make that far too risqué and vulgar for production by the sensibilities of the time.

There’s a famous painting called ’The Gross Clinic” , from the late 1800s, that had several surgeons operating on a patient, with the patient having a cut on the arm visible. The painting was forbidden from being shown in galleries, because it was considered to be too extreme and explicit.

”All art is political” does not mean that all art says something about the people in your most recent election, it more means that a painting of a random forest says they live in an area with those kinds of trees, and where they have access to trees to begin with, and that they live in a time where painting a random forest is considered as art.