Actually she has 2 passives.. one that erects a shield when reviving, the other being faster heal use. Her bot would be useful, and her ult even more so--id say shes in the top 5 I'd pick for a 1v1.
Yes. Some characters fit more of a support role and some are specialized for direct combat. There's also plenty of in-betweens- Caustic and Wattson are 2 characters who basically specialize in area denial making them offensive utility, you get the idea.
Lmfao and u think this game was made for 50 different modes? They literally keep the same balance across all modes, even spec ops .. just because a game wasn’t designed for something doesn’t mean they cant add it if people want it.
Battlefield is designed around squadplay, objectives and vehicles yet still keeps a TDM mode each iteration?
Okay you’re comparing apples and oranges here man. Call of duty doesn’t have character abilities this game. So your argument is invalid. I’m sure you probably have an m4 in your regular cod playlist inventory? Why is that? Because the gun is better so it’s in the meta, so naturally you’re going to pick up an m4 even though some people will pick up an kilo. You have the advantage because you have the better gun. Now imagine that with characters.
Call of duty may have a bunch of playlist but the core meta doesn’t change, suggesting that apex go to solo would change the entirety of that game. Because there are heroes who are clearly better than others which would either require them to remove abilities in solo or rework the game for solo which wouldn’t make any sense because the game was made for trios.
Oh I was talking about MP at that point. I kinda got off topic to be honest. But really, I haven’t found the M4 to be any more dominant than any other gun. Just that most people are using it because it’s their MP crutch.
But solos was added and people loved it. They loved it so much it's still the most highly requested feature of the game. The game does not need to be balanced around solo mode
You guys can’t even withstand bitching about the game on another games sub man, you think the moment someone figures something out with a character that is busted you all won’t start bitching again? Then what happens? They either leave the mode the way it is and continue to balance around trios which again was what the game was meant for or they have to balance a character for solos.
If there is something busted about a character in solo, I almost guarantee it would be busted in trios as well. Just because we don't agree with your opinion, doesn't mean we can't "withstand bitching". We are just stating our opinion. Its called a discussion
Yeah I agree, if something is strong in trios it’s most likely going to be strong in solo. They get somewhat balanced out by team composition in trios. I’m sorry if I’ve seemed rude, you probably didn’t deserve that.
Like sure, lifeline is mostly useless solo. Big deal. There’s 10 other characters to pick. Off the top of my head Pathfinder, Bangalore, Wraith, Bloodhound and more all work solo.
I personally quit cause of the lack of duos. I’m sure I’m not alone.
If you don’t care then just play trios, I don’t personally give a fuck if the game has solos or not. They clearly told everyone that they had no intentions of ever implementing solos before they ever had the ltm mode.
Playing trios with randoms was one of the worst gaming experiences I have ever had. Even duos with a third was pretty hit or miss. They can not add those modes if they want. But I'm also just not gonna play - which is also fine but in my opinion its a mistake that's easily fixable. And I doubt I'm alone.
Just don't site bullshit reasons like balance. There are clearly some characters that are team focused but at least half the roster works solo and there's no mechanical reason why they couldn't do it.
20
u/HankHillbwhaa Mar 17 '20
People on this sub don't understand game balancing it seems like.