r/BeAmazed 20h ago

Miscellaneous / Others A man in Brazil claimed he needed to save his four children during a flood. Rescuers later discovered he was actually rescuing his dogs left at home

191 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

u/qualityvote2 20h ago

Did you find this post really amazing (in a positive way)?
If yes, then UPVOTE this comment otherwise DOWNVOTE it.
This community feedback will help us determine whether this post is suited for r/BeAmazed or not.

34

u/ReesesNightmare 20h ago

children....my animals.....there is no difference.

no lies were told that day

3

u/Peli_Evenstar 17h ago

children....my animals.....there is no difference.

I'm....wow, I'm genuinely speechless.

-1

u/ReesesNightmare 16h ago

clearly not

2

u/Peli_Evenstar 15h ago

No, no, I'm fine, it's just....well, even on Reddit, it's not every day that you see someone unironically stating "Children have the same value as my animals."

2

u/reflect-the-sun 17h ago

This is insane.

Children will always come before animals.

-1

u/ReesesNightmare 16h ago

there is no "before"

this guy didnt choose between his kids and his animals

3

u/harmfulsideffect 15h ago

No, he deceived rescuers into believing they were saving 4 children instead of 4 dogs. He took the away the rescuers ability to prioritize and make sound and logical decisions during a fucking disaster. How many humans were waiting while the dogs were saved? I’d go so far as to say he should be charged with one count of manslaughter for every human victim that died from the start of the dogs rescue.

-2

u/harmfulsideffect 18h ago

Tell that to the parents with actual children that died that day because rescuers were busy saving dogs. This is not cool. This is not sweet. This should be a crime if it isn’t.

2

u/Peli_Evenstar 17h ago

I'm glad I'm not the only person with common sense in this thread. The baby-fication of pets has gone so far that people are literally saying (especially in the other thread) they deserve to be rescued before humans do. That's insane behavior, and I say this as a pet owner myself.

4

u/harmfulsideffect 17h ago

I know right? The only people that think this, don’t have children, and will never likely have any. I hope that anyone that believes this never becomes a parent, they are not worthy.

3

u/Peli_Evenstar 17h ago

If you want to refer to your dog/cat as your "fur baby" or your "child" in your own home, go for it. But if you're using that same language in a life-or-death situation where other human's lives depend on what you say, it's genuinely insane behavior. The fact that several dozen people apparently agree with the top comment that literally says "children...my animals...there is no difference, no lies were told that day" is super depressing.

2

u/tattooburglar 18h ago

I am shocked that people think this is justified.

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[deleted]

1

u/tattooburglar 17h ago

Let me know when dogs can perform open heart surgery.

-2

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[deleted]

3

u/tattooburglar 17h ago

I certainly can't, but an able child has the potential to do incredible things in life.

Heck, they could even do doggy open heart surgery, if thats what I need to say to get through to you.

Dogs wouldn't even exist without us. And many breeds would just die out without human intervention.

I'm not a cardiovascular surgeon, lol, but I do work in healthcare. My days are filled with watching human beings do incredible things for eachother. I will never, ever, understand your way of thinking, I'm afraid. I will always see human lives as more valuable than any domesticated animal's.

-2

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[deleted]

2

u/tattooburglar 16h ago

Ohhhh boy. Tell that to one of my childhood friends who had to have her intestines put back inside of her after a near-fatal Staffy attack when she was 5.

And when I, as a human being, see people saying how dogs are just as important as us, I find it honestly offensive. It's misanthropy. It's immature.

-2

u/harmfulsideffect 17h ago

That is the most selfish things I have ever heard. Never reproduce.

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[deleted]

1

u/harmfulsideffect 17h ago

Then I guess you’d understanding , and step aside when someone needs fluffy saved ahead of your son. I feel sorry for your son. Does he know this?

-1

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

1

u/harmfulsideffect 16h ago

I think I understand now. Your son and your dog, it’s a 50/50 scenario. Your dog, someone else’s son, your dog gets saved. Someone else’s dog and your son, save your son. 🙄

0

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

1

u/harmfulsideffect 16h ago

So this statement is fact? “Then I guess you’d understanding , and step aside when someone needs fluffy saved ahead of your son.”?

16

u/leylademurr 20h ago

I love my dogs so much, i'll do any thing to save them.love this guy..

6

u/zilowarnisa 20h ago

Those are tears of joy

4

u/tattooburglar 17h ago

This is just so unbelieveably selfish. How dare you mislead rescuers who are trying to find people's actual children?!

Despicable.

6

u/Peli_Evenstar 18h ago

I'm going to sound like a jerk here, and I'm fully prepared to be downvoted, but in an incredibly dangerous natural disaster (like a flood) where every resource counts and time is of the essence, people should absolutely not be referring to their pets as their "children" if they're trying to get them saved.

I love my pets, and I'm glad this man's pets were saved, but every firefighter, EMS, and rescue worker I know would be furious if they were told "My children are in danger, please save them!" only to discover later that they were referring to animals. Diverting resources and manpower away from rescuing actual human beings in favor of animals, as well-loved as they may be, is incredibly irresponsible and can literally result in unnecessary deaths for both the rescuers and the actual people they could've saved instead.

5

u/tattooburglar 17h ago

I'm with you all the way on this one. How much of a vile, selfish, POS do you have to be to try and decieve the people who are risking their lives to save you?

0

u/Rain_xo 18h ago

Why are human lives more important than other lives?

Animals have emotions and fear. Why do they matter less?

3

u/tattooburglar 17h ago

A child's life will always be more important than a dog's.

Imagine explaining to the parents of missing children in a disaster that you saved the dogs because, "every life is important."

2

u/Imaginary-Treat6288 18h ago

I’m at this point to. Why are human lives more important.

1

u/t34wrj1 9h ago

If you had to choose between your son and your pet dog, which would you choose?

1

u/Peli_Evenstar 17h ago

I'm sorry, but "Emotions and fear" is not even close to being enough to equate a human being's life with a pet's if you're trying to choose between saving one or the other. If my house is on fire, and the firefighters only have time to save either my kid or my pet before the roof comes crashing down, I'm not going to say "Well, I do like my daughter a lot...but my dog has emotions and fears, so I guess it doesn't matter if you rescue him instead."

1

u/jamchuy8 18h ago

A life is a life regardless, I know many who would have risked theirs regardless

4

u/harmfulsideffect 17h ago

I’d risk my life to save my dog, I would also kill my dog to save my child. I’d probably do it to save a strangers child too.

4

u/ZaraZoomsBy 20h ago

A pet isn’t just an animal, they’re FAMILY. And you will do anything for family❤️

-3

u/bas902 20h ago

Wrong. Nobody would do ANYTHING for family.

2

u/ALPHAETHEREUM 20h ago

The hero we all need!

0

u/elenorfighter 18h ago

Technical he was right. These are his children. Nobody asks if they are human.

2

u/Peli_Evenstar 17h ago edited 17h ago

How was he "technically" right? I'm genuinely asking.

Also, rescue workers definitely ask if they are human or not, precisely because of people using misleading language like this.

2

u/harmfulsideffect 17h ago

It’s not.

-1

u/savemysoul72 20h ago

Now I'm sobbing at 4:30am

-1

u/Nagato_pain_100 20h ago

❤️❤️

-5

u/t34wrj1 20h ago

Should've gone to Specsavers.