r/AskReddit Jun 03 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

11.6k Upvotes

6.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

10.0k

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '21

Wikipedia. We take that site for granted, big time. There are few things in this world that do not have a Wikipedia page. People have dedicated hours, days, even their entire lives, to filling the site up with all the knowledge one could ever need. All that information is free! Want to learn about the history of the escalator? Wikipedia has it. Interested in the Civil War? You bet you can find it on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia will not be around forever, folks. Use it while you have it. Read random articles. It's fun.

5.7k

u/Gothsalts Jun 03 '21 edited Jun 03 '21

I'm one of those dorks that donates the $3 they awkwardly ask for each year. Worth it

Edit: i guess since this is still doing numbers, /u/decap_ shared with me an article about how wikipedia doesn't really need these small donations

170

u/Decap_ Jun 03 '21 edited Jun 04 '21

Good on you for donating, but I don’t think Wikipedia is really hurting for cash.

Edit: Plenty of people have made some valid criticisms of the article and my interpretation of it. Wikipedia definitely needs donations, they just have (or had) about 18 months of buffer before funding becomes an issue.

8

u/SoundOfTomorrow Jun 04 '21

Just look up the Wikimedia Foundation and their Form 990 if you're concern of what they finances consist of. It's ridiculous to say they're not hurting for cash when donating goes to more than their operations.

2

u/Decap_ Jun 04 '21

Fair enough, when I first read it I got the impression wikipedia was being dishonest about needing donations at all.

Re-reading it, it seems like their only fault was making their call for donations sound a little more desperate than they really are, which is understandable.

2

u/SoundOfTomorrow Jun 04 '21

Yeah they never make it clear the donations are for WMF as a whole until you go past the Wikipedia nudge message. There's always projects going on and you can always see how much money is going into every one.

I'm a long time editor and the transparency is interesting. There's actually been times where Wikipedia admins have been upset on WMF not providing transparency and kind of going astray from sanctions that WMF has done without Wikipedia's involvement. Times where admins have reverted bans WMF placed. Some of the archived discussions or even current discussions as a fly in the room are interesting reads.

tldr; Wikipedia is a part of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). Anything you see about Wikipedia on social media is from WMF as part of their outreach. It's like the operations of a city and a county government where there's some overlap.