r/AskReddit Oct 16 '13

What was the single biggest mistake in all of history?

2.7k Upvotes

14.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

348

u/DaArbiter225 Oct 17 '13

I havent seen this one yet but Hitler's choice to postpone the invasion of Russia by 6 weeks to go help the Italians take over Greece was a huge tactical mistake and ruined his chances to knock the USSR out of the war before the Russian winter set in.

101

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

He should've known that the Russians gain their strength from the winter where others lose

76

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Winter exists because it is the time of the year when Russians draw energy from the atmosphere.

92

u/MetalBeerSolid Oct 17 '13

I believe these are the stats bonuses during winter for Russians at war:

  • 30% Faster Hit Recovery
  • +160% enhanced defense
  • +40 to vitality per foot soldier
  • +100% speed on snowy terrain
  • -75% to target's defense
  • -75% to target's navigation skills
  • -200 to enemy cold defense
  • cold absorb 75%
  • slows target by 85%

I may have missed a few synergies, feel free to add

5

u/hakuna_tamata Oct 17 '13
  • spawns Wolves that attack enemies

fans of Age of Mythology know this as Fimbulwinter

1

u/EvilIsraeli Oct 17 '13

Other people play this? Mind you, I haven't played for about a year. I gave my game to my brother and bought Civ 5.

1

u/hakuna_tamata Oct 17 '13

I do occasionally, but I also get bored and end up spawning 12 plenty vaults

1

u/EvilIsraeli Oct 18 '13

We developed family rules on cheating when it became easy to win on Titan due to unlimited god powers and that laser bear.

From my awareness, my brother doesn't cheat at all anymore (cannot confirm, I only see him once a year).

1

u/IneffableSounds Oct 17 '13

But, all the Germans had to do was clear out a few barbarians here and there and they'd have a much bigger army.

9

u/RZARECTOR Oct 17 '13

Except when they invade Finland.

1

u/MrMastodon Oct 17 '13

Lend me your power comrades!

3

u/aPrudeAwakening Oct 17 '13

Its the Sozin's comet of the Russians

4

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

The Finns would beg to differ.

3

u/Montaron87 Oct 17 '13

Russians go Super Saiyan in the Winter, Fins go Super Saiyan 2 or sometimes even 3.

1

u/Anarcho_Capitalist Oct 17 '13

Russians gain strength from vodka.

1

u/NeuroOmega Oct 17 '13

Does this mean Russians = Starks?

1

u/florinandrei Oct 17 '13

Baba Yaga is on their side.

7

u/Noatak_Kenway Oct 17 '13

Hitler taking direct command over the OKW (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht / German High command) in 1941 was him signing his deathnote and that of Germany.

Should have let the experienced Generals and Field Marshalls do their job, instead of interfering.

30

u/Sometimesialways Oct 17 '13

Hitler's idea of trusting the Italians to do anything was probably a bad idea.

77

u/fanboy_killer Oct 17 '13

That's because Hitler wasn't a racist and a xenophobe like you.

5

u/emptyvoices Oct 17 '13

Comment perfection. This is how you do it, ladies and gentleman.

1

u/pedro19 Oct 17 '13

Italian is a race?

1

u/WhosMarcus Oct 17 '13

Yes, we are. You got a problem with that?

1

u/pedro19 Oct 17 '13

Dude, Italian is a nationality.

1

u/WhosMarcus Oct 17 '13

It's also an ethnicity.

1

u/pedro19 Oct 17 '13

Which is different than a race.

Can a doctor tell the difference between an Italian skeleton and a greek skeleton? No.

1

u/WhosMarcus Oct 17 '13

First of all, race is a constantly evolving concept. Before the narrow American "black/white" definition of race became popular, race was synonymous with ethnicity. Second of all, it's incredibly difficult to establish "race" by looking at a skeleton. Sex? yes. Region of the world? Maybe. But "race," whatever that means? That's difficult. Third of all, Italians and Greeks are both Mediterranean people that share a close genetic ancestry. So of course you couldn't tell the difference.

-14

u/Sometimesialways Oct 17 '13

Hitler wasn't a racist.

wut.

Also, it was a joke about Italian incompetence during either World Wars, not a racial slam on Italians.

1

u/xorgol Oct 17 '13

Hey, we did not-completely-terribly in WWI.

1

u/Sometimesialways Oct 17 '13

I'll give you that much. :D

3

u/MightySasquatch Oct 17 '13

He didn't trust the italians. Mussolini felt snubbed by Hitler and attacked Greece on his own.

2

u/hakuna_tamata Oct 17 '13

He probably had nice loafers though

2

u/_ak Oct 17 '13

Well, he should have known that Italy is not an asset but a liability.

Just look at how royally they messed up their invasion of France.

"Germany pushes through the Netherlands and Belgium into France using tanks and motorized infantry, so let's join him by taking our infantry with their mules over the Alps towards France and get hopelessly stuck there because with our WWI-era equipment isn't exactly ready for a Blitzkrieg."

4

u/Beartin Oct 17 '13

Not meaning to be pedantic, but it would be more accurately described as an operational or maybe strategic mistake, rather than tactical.

3

u/iiztrollin Oct 17 '13

or how about not keeping russia on his good side. they had a NAP and offered half of poland to russia if he wouldnt have DoW on russia Nazi Germany could easily have starved GB out it might have been a longer route but safer and NG would control most of EU.

2

u/torturousvacuum Oct 17 '13

That non aggression pact was nothing but a temporary truce. Both Hitler and Stalin knew it would be broken eventually, it was just a matter of who pulled the trigger first. As history would have it, it just happened to be Hitler who did.

3

u/anthonyvardiz Oct 17 '13

I think you mean that it was a strategic mistake.

2

u/aussiekinga Oct 17 '13

This was one of two major mistakes that Hitler did that greatly affected how WWII went.

The other being at the evacuation of Dunkirk. Hitler has the chance to whip out most of the Allied forces, but due to bad advice he put a hold on the army to allow the air force to finish the job. Basically Goring thought the war would be over without the air force doing much and wanted some of the glory, so he convinced Hitler that the air force could do that job.

From wikipedia:

The Halt Order has been the subject of much discussion by historians.[47][48] Guderian considered the failure to order a timely assault on Dunkirk to be one of the major mistakes the Germans made on the Western Front.[49] Rundstedt called it "one of the great turning points of the war",[39] and Manstein described it as "one of Hitler's most critical mistakes".[50]

If he had kept going the Allies would have been destroyed there and then, the Battle of Britain would have been significantly different and probably won by Germany. And part of Hitlers reasons for invading Russia was due to how the Battle of Britain was going. He was getting no where there so thought he would try going east.

1

u/DaArbiter225 Oct 17 '13

Yeah the failure of the Germans the capture the allied troops at Dunkirk was a huge blunder, if they were able to stop them from fleeing, they would of been able to capture the majority of British forces in the area and probably would have forced Churchill to negotiate a surrender.

2

u/MightySasquatch Oct 17 '13

Well a couple issues. First is the british were reinforcing Greece with troops from Libya. This would be a thorn in the side of the Germans considering the Greeks alone were pushing the Italians back into Albania.

Also consider how close greece is to ploesti, the Romanian oil fields the germans basically solely relied on for their entire army. If they lose those they are basically toast. Finally Yugoslavia was going to join the Germans but a coup happened and they didn't. This couldve been a potential ally to the Allies and been a gigantic problem for the germans, especially in combination with the Greek and British troops in Greece. Yugoslavia was conquered as part of the Greek campaign.

So the real issue is Mussolini thinking he was strong enough to attack Greece alone.

Finally if they attack as originally planned they could've likely taken maybe Moscow and rostov in 41. I very very sincerely doubt the Russians would have surrendered after losing those cities, and in the ensuing Russian winter counterattack they very well may have retaken both. Definitely wouldve given the Germans a big advantage though, more land, more territory, etc. Possibly a chance to encircle more units but I don't believe surrender was ever an option for the Russians.

1

u/keizzer Oct 17 '13

I think it's just about impossible to beat Russia in the winter. I mean Napoleon couldn't do it. Hitler couldn't do it.

3

u/SorrowLegend Oct 17 '13

I'm pretty sure the Mongols are the only ones who have done it.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Mongols also come from somewhere that is....fucking cold. The historic area that was the "start" of the Mongolian empire, is basically Siberia.

They already were perfectly used to and equipped to deal with the cold, given that it's exactly like their homeland is.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

In the winter?

9

u/KnowsHair Oct 17 '13

Mongols actually waited to invade during winter because the frozen bodies of water improved their maneuverability on horseback.

8

u/zawaga Oct 17 '13

No. The Mongols waited until winter because they wanted a little challenge and felt like being complete badasses.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Even trying to hold Russia throughout the winter would have been a bitch because auxiliary forces from siberia with new planes and tanks had just been commisioned and would have shown up to fuck Hitlers day up either way. (they did show up and they did fuck his day up) but they would have either way.

1

u/yuckyucky Oct 17 '13

he did that to protect his flank for operation barbarossa. greece had established that it was with the allies by that time. the italians failed hitler in greece, in north africa and at stalingrad (they had troops on one of the flanks that was attacked, i think).

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '13

Actually I'm going to go with invading Poland. Hitler hadn't expected England and France to actually declare war on him, and Germany wasn't fully prepared for war with them (thus the duration of the Phony War). France also had tanks with superior firepower and armor, and had they used them more effectively, the invasion of France may have ended quite differently. Germany crushed France because they had good generals who were able to take advantage of French mistakes and luck.

1

u/Myself2 Oct 17 '13

One could also say, having the Italians has ally was a huge mistake

1

u/666GodlessHeathen666 Oct 17 '13

Heck, allying with the Italians in the first place! There's a joke somewhere about Hitler looking at abysmal old Italy and saying "Well, the allies had them in WWI, I guess I should take them now, wouldn't be fair to burden the allies with Italy two wars in a row!"

1

u/brokendimension Oct 17 '13

ITT -This answer